Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34624030›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Demographic responses of a threatened, low-density ungulate to annual variation in meteorological and phenological conditions.

Craig A DeMars, Sophie Gilbert, Robert Serrouya, Allicia P Kelly, Nicholas C Larter, Dave Hervieux, Stan Boutin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanisms and impacts of migration by moose: The role of wildfire.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Craig A DeMarsCaribou Monitoring Unit, Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7984-633X
Sophie GilbertDepartment of Fish & Wildlife Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States of America.
Robert SerrouyaCaribou Monitoring Unit, Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5233-6081
Allicia P KellyDepartment of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of Northwest Territories, Fort Smith, NT, Canada.
Nicholas C LarterDepartment of Environment and Natural Resources (retired), Government of Northwest Territories, Fort Simpson, NT, Canada.
Dave HervieuxAlberta Environment and Parks, Grande Prairie, AB, Canada.
Stan BoutinDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As global climate change progresses, wildlife management will benefit from knowledge of demographic responses to climatic variation, particularly for species already endangered by other stressors. In Canada, climate change is expected to increasingly impact populations of threatened woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) and much focus has been placed on how a warming climate has potentially facilitated the northward expansion of apparent competitors and novel predators. Climate change, however, may also exert more direct effects on caribou populations that are not mediated by predation. These effects include meteorological changes that influence resource availability and energy expenditure. Research on other ungulates suggests that climatic variation may have minimal impact on low-density populations such as woodland caribou because per-capita resources may remain sufficient even in "bad" years. We evaluated this prediction using demographic data from 21 populations in western Canada that were monitored for various intervals between 1994 and 2015. We specifically assessed whether juvenile recruitment and adult female survival were correlated with annual variation in meteorological metrics and plant phenology. Against expectations, we found that both vital rates appeared to be influenced by annual climatic variation. Juvenile recruitment was primarily correlated with variation in phenological conditions in the year prior to birth. Adult female survival was more strongly correlated with meteorological conditions and declined during colder, more variable winters. These responses may be influenced by the life history of woodland caribou, which reside in low-productivity refugia where small climatic changes may result in changes to resources that are sufficient to elicit strong demographic effects. Across all models, explained variation in vital rates was low, suggesting that other factors had greater influence on caribou demography. Nonetheless, given the declining trajectories of many woodland caribou populations, our results highlight the increased relevance of recovery actions when adverse climatic conditions are likely to negatively affect caribou demography.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemAnimalsAnimals, WildCanadaClimate ChangeEndangered SpeciesMammalsMeteorologyModels, BiologicalPopulation DynamicsPredatory BehaviorReindeerSeasons

Identifiers

PMID34624030
PMCPMC8500449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.