Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34624013›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Segmentation-Less, Automated, Vascular Vectorization.

Samuel A Mihelic, William A Sikora, Ahmed M Hassan, Michael R Williamson, Theresa A Jones, Andrew K Dunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pulse train gating to improve signal generation forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samuel A MihelicDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
William A SikoraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9583-4766
Ahmed M HassanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9009-1481
Michael R WilliamsonInstitute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8049-4463
Theresa A JonesInstitute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2854-8003
Andrew K DunnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

Optical Imaging of Baseline Blood Flow and Oxygenation During StrokeR01EB011556 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DUNN, ANDREW K · 2010 to 2018
$3.1M
Longitudinal Imaging of Cortical Small Vessel Network Structure with Two-Color Multiphoton Fluorescence MicroscopyR01NS108484 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DUNN, ANDREW K · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
Comprehensive Training Program in Imaging Science and InformaticsT32EB007507 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARKEY, MIA K, RYLANDER, HENRY GRADY · 2009 to 2024
$2.7M
Microscale Oxygenation Mapping During StrokeR01NS082518 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DUNN, ANDREW K · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB011556NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007507NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082518NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS108484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in two-photon fluorescence microscopy (2PM) have allowed large scale imaging and analysis of blood vessel networks in living mice. However, extracting network graphs and vector representations for the dense capillary bed remains a bottleneck in many applications. Vascular vectorization is algorithmically difficult because blood vessels have many shapes and sizes, the samples are often unevenly illuminated, and large image volumes are required to achieve good statistical power. State-of-the-art, three-dimensional, vascular vectorization approaches often require a segmented (binary) image, relying on manual or supervised-machine annotation. Therefore, voxel-by-voxel image segmentation is biased by the human annotator or trainer. Furthermore, segmented images oftentimes require remedial morphological filtering before skeletonization or vectorization. To address these limitations, we present a vectorization method to extract vascular objects directly from unsegmented images without the need for machine learning or training. The Segmentation-Less, Automated, Vascular Vectorization (SLAVV) source code in MATLAB is openly available on GitHub. This novel method uses simple models of vascular anatomy, efficient linear filtering, and vector extraction algorithms to remove the image segmentation requirement, replacing it with manual or automated vector classification. Semi-automated SLAVV is demonstrated on three in vivo 2PM image volumes of microvascular networks (capillaries, arterioles and venules) in the mouse cortex. Vectorization performance is proven robust to the choice of plasma- or endothelial-labeled contrast, and processing costs are shown to scale with input image volume. Fully-automated SLAVV performance is evaluated on simulated 2PM images of varying quality all based on the large (1.4×0.9×0.6 mm3 and 1.6×108 voxel) input image. Vascular statistics of interest (e.g. volume fraction, surface area density) calculated from automatically vectorized images show greater robustness to image quality than those calculated from intensity-thresholded images.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCerebrovascular CirculationComputational BiologyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicrovessels

Identifiers

PMID34624013
PMCPMC8528315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.