Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34623926›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2021

A Validated Risk Prediction Model for Breast Cancer in US Black Women.

Julie R Palmer, Gary Zirpoli, Kimberly A Bertrand, Tracy Battaglia, Leslie Bernstein, Christine B Ambrosone, Elisa V Bandera, Melissa A Troester, Lynn Rosenberg, Ruth M Pfeiffer and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Testing Explanations for Skepticism of Personalized Risk Information.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julie R PalmerSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-6534-335X
Gary ZirpoliSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-1417-5349
Kimberly A BertrandSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-4565-7618
Tracy BattagliaBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Leslie BernsteinCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-7692-6518
Christine B AmbrosoneRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-1717-9943
Elisa V BanderaRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.ORCID 0000-0002-8789-2755
Melissa A TroesterUniversity of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-9506-6624
Lynn RosenbergSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA.
Ruth M PfeifferNational Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-7791-2698
Ludovic TrinquartBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

Funding

Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHARLES M PEROU · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
A Follow-up Study for Causes of Cancer in Black WomenU01CA164974 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Kimberly A. Bertrand, Yvette C Cozier · 2017 to 2026
$24.0M
FOLLOW-UP STUDY FOR CAUSES OF ILLNESS IN BLACK WOMENR01CA058420 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ROSENBERG, LYNN · 1999 to 2013
$20.7M
Race &Risk Factors for Early/Aggressive Breast CancerR01CA100598 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI AMBROSONE, CHRISTINE B. · 2004 to 2008
$4.8M
Improving Breast Cancer Risk Prediction for African American Women: Consideration of Estrogen Receptor Subtype-Specific Risk FactorsR01CA228357 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI PALMER, JULIE R · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS R01 CA058420NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100598NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228357NCI NIH HHS U01 CA164974NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer risk prediction models are used to identify high-risk women for early detection, targeted interventions, and enrollment into prevention trials. We sought to develop and evaluate a risk prediction model for breast cancer in US Black women, suitable for use in primary care settings.

methodsBreast cancer relative risks and attributable risks were estimated using data from Black women in three US population-based case-control studies (3,468 breast cancer cases; 3,578 controls age 30-69 years) and combined with SEER age- and race-specific incidence rates, with incorporation of competing mortality, to develop an absolute risk model. The model was validated in prospective data among 51,798 participants of the Black Women's Health Study, including 1,515 who developed invasive breast cancer. A second risk prediction model was developed on the basis of estrogen receptor (ER)-specific relative risks and attributable risks. Model performance was assessed by calibration (expected/observed cases) and discriminatory accuracy (C-statistic).

resultsThe expected/observed ratio was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.07). Age-adjusted C-statistics were 0.58 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.59) overall and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.68) among women younger than 40 years. These measures were almost identical in the model based on estrogen receptor-specific relative risks and attributable risks.

conclusionDiscriminatory accuracy of the new model was similar to that of the most frequently used questionnaire-based breast cancer risk prediction models in White women, suggesting that effective risk stratification for Black women is now possible. This model may be especially valuable for risk stratification of young Black women, who are below the ages at which breast cancer screening is typically begun.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisUnited StatesWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID34623926
PMCPMC8608262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.