ArticleScience advances2021
MagneTEskin-Reconstructing skin by magnetically induced assembly of autologous microtissue cores.
Article in Science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skin organoid-derived exosomes in a hydrogel system potentiate skin wound healing.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- The role and mechanism of 3D-printed hydrogel-CGF/PLGA composite polymer in promoting skin burn healing.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- Novel Techniques in Fractional Skin Replacement.European burn journal · 2025Review
- Macrophage metabolism reprogramming EGCG-Cu coordination capsules delivered in polyzwitterionic hydrogel for burn wound healing and regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Performance of hybrid gelatin-PVA bioinks integrated with genipin through extrusion-based 3D bioprinting: AnInternational journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- In Situ 3D Bioprinting Living Photosynthetic Scaffolds for Autotrophic Wound Healing.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin wounds are immense medical and socioeconomic burdens, and autologous skin grafting remains the gold standard for wound repair. We recently found that full-thickness micro skin tissue columns (MSTCs) can be harvested with minimal donor site morbidity, and that MSTCs applied to wounds “randomly” (without maintaining their natural epidermal-dermal orientation) can accelerate re-epithelialization. However, despite MSTCs containing all the cellular and extracellular contents of full-thickness skin, normal dermal architecture was not restored by random MSTCs. In this study, we developed a magnetically induced assembly method to produce constructs of densely packed, oriented MSTCs that closely resemble the overall architecture of full-thickness skin to test the hypothesis that maintaining MSTCs’ orientation could further hasten healing and restore a normal dermis. Our method led to faster and more orderly re-epithelialization but unexpectedly did not improve the retention of dermal architecture, which reveals a hitherto unappreciated role for tissue morphology in determining dermal remodeling outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.