ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2022
The Saliva Cortisol and Amylase Levels Related with Stress Response Compared by Different Analytical Methods.
Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Implications and Research Progress of Salivary Biomarkers for Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Review
- Intrathecal pump refills at home or at the hospital: Protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial-The IMPROVE study.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sampling of salivary cortisol and amylase is a non-invasive method and important for the evaluation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function and stress levels. This study aimed to compare the values of the salivary cortisol and amylase levels which were measured by three different analytical methods to discuss the alterations of stress levels of samples. The saliva samples of young adults (n = 23) were collected between 08.00 and 09.00 a.m., noon at 12.00 (before exam) and between 14.00 and 15.00 p.m. (after unaware exam). The samples were measured within the first 48 h, and no freezing/thawing was done. Salivary cortisol and amylase levels of subjects were measured by three different analytical methods as ELISA, chemiluminescence and biosensor methods. Comparison of ELISA and biosensor methods in order to determine the salivary cortisol levels showed a good correlation y = 2.971 + 0.748x (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.