ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022
Cervical suppurative lymphadenitis in children: microbiology, primary sites of infection, and evaluation of antibiotic treatment.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Case report: Cervical suppurative lymphadenitis caused by burkholderia multivorans in a healthy child.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Pediatric Cervical Lymphadenitis: Etiology, Clinical Presentation, and Antimicrobial Resistance.International journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Maxillofacial infections in lithuanian hospitalised children and adolescents: a 17-years retrospective study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe significant pathogens associated with paediatric cervical suppurative lymphadenitis (CSL) are unclarified, and there is a lack of clinical evaluations of antibiotic regimens in paediatric CSL. We aimed to (1) explore the bacterial findings and the associated primary sites of infection in paediatric cases of CSL and (2) evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients treated with different antibiotic regimens.
methodsAll children (< 18 years) treated for non-mycobacterium CSL at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Aarhus University Hospital, from 2001 to 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.
resultsEighty-five patients were included in the study. The prevalent isolates were S. aureus (57%), S. pyogenes (17%), non-haemolytic streptococci (11%), and F. necrophorum (3%). The primary sites of infection were identified in 30 (35%) patients. The most common sites were the oropharynx (n = 15), the middle ear (n = 10), and the skin (n = 5). All patients were treated with surgical incision and antibiotics. No statistically significant differences were found between patients treated with antibiotics covering streptococci (n = 60) versus antibiotics covering streptococci and S. aureus (n = 25) in terms of duration of hospitalisation (median 4 vs 4 days, p = 0.26), altered antibiotic treatment because of insufficient clinical or biochemical progress (7% vs 12%, p = 0.41), and abscess recurrence (8% vs 12%, p = 0.69).
conclusionS. aureus was the predominant pathogen in paediatric CSL at all cervical levels, and even in cases with evidence of primary site infection not normally associated with S. aureus. We were unable to underscore the importance of antibiotic treatment covering S. aureus based on evaluation of the clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.