Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34623464›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2021

[Model systems in gastroenterological research : From animal models to human organoids to the clinic].

Frank Arnold, Alexander Kleger

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frank ArnoldAbteilung für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland.
Alexander KlegerAbteilung für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland. alexander.kleger@uni-ulm.de.
University Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last few decades, various models have been established within gastroenterological research that have significantly contributed to a better understanding of the (patho)physiological processes of various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases (inflammation, organ injuries, carcinomas). This review will focus on such models including genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), xenografts, and organoid-based culture systems. GEMMs laid the foundation for successful modeling of such diseases. These have the decisive advantage that diseases can be assessed in their physiological environment and thus allow the examination of cell-cell communications of various cell types (epithelium, fibroblast, immune cells). However, the discrepancy between the genetic background of mice and humans reflected a pivotal disadvantage that could at least partially be circumvented by transplanting human cells into immunocompromised host animals. The time-consuming and labor-intensive generation of such xenograft models, however, considerably limits their usefulness for timely preclinical drug screenings. Thus, novel organoid-based human cell culture systems from adult stem cells or pluripotent stem cells are a promising human tool for modeling GI diseases. The first results already show their usefulness in the regulation of adult tissue homeostasis, regeneration, and tumor development. In addition, this system can be easily established in clinical diagnostics and thus enables real-time ex vivo pharmacotyping to develop personalized therapy strategies, particularly for cancer patients.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal DiseasesNeoplasmsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansOrganoidsMouse modelsOrganoidsOrgan-on-a-ChipPersonalized medicineXenografts

Identifiers

PMID34623464
PMCPMC8498756
OpenAlexW3204364202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.