Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34623319›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Engaging Institutional Stakeholders to Develop and Implement Guidelines for Recruiting Participants in Research Studies Using Social Media: Mixed Methods, Multi-Phase Process.

Elizabeth Flood-Grady, Lauren B Solberg, Claire Baralt, Meghan Meyer, Jeff Stevens, Janice L Krieger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Participant recruitment for paediatric research using social media: A practical 'how-to' guide for researchers.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth Flood-GradySTEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1827-1082
Lauren B SolbergDepartment of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4779-1201
Claire BaraltUniversity of Florida Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1759-3784
Meghan MeyerClinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9834-5925
Jeff StevensUniversity of Florida Health Web Services, Communications & Information Technology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7722-772X
Janice L KriegerSTEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9950-9170

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited regulatory guidance surrounding the use of social media channels for participant recruitment is an interdisciplinary challenge. Establishing stakeholder-informed procedures is essential for ethical and effective use of social media for participant recruitment.

objectiveThis study aims to provide replicable procedures for developing and implementing guidelines for using social media to recruit participants in research studies.

methodsSocial media use cases at the university were used to identify institutional stakeholders for the initiative. After establishing workflow procedures, a scoping review of web-based materials about recruitment and research on the internet and social media from 19 peer institutions and 2 federal agencies was conducted to inform the structure of the policies and procedures. End users (investigators and study coordinators; N=14) also provided feedback on the policies and procedures and implementation.

resultsRepresentatives (n=7) from 5 institutional offices and 15 subject-matter experts from 5 areas were identified as stakeholders in the development of policies and procedures. Peers with web-based materials (n=16) identified in the scoping review revealed 4 themes that served as a basis for developing our policies and procedures. End user feedback further informed the policies and procedures and implementation. A centrally managed social media account for communicating with participants and hosting advertising campaigns on social media was also established and, when combined with the policies and procedures, resulted in 39 advertising campaigns, and 2846 participants were enrolled in health and clinical research studies.

conclusionsOur policies and procedures allow research teams to harness the potential of social media to increase study recruitment and participation; the transparent, stakeholder-informed process can be replicated by institutional administrators to establish policies and procedures that meet the interests and needs of their research community.

Indexed as

Social MediaAdvertisingHumansInterdisciplinary StudiesReview Literature as Topichealth communicationresearch recruitmentsocial mediastakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID34623319
PMCPMC8538033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.