Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34623314›Full record

ReviewJMIR aging2021

Factors Influencing Implementation of eHealth Technologies to Support Informal Dementia Care: Umbrella Review.

Sofia Bastoni, Christian Wrede, Marcia Cristina da Silva, Robbert Sanderman, Andrea Gaggioli, Annemarie Braakman-Jansen, Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07010874 (THE EFFECT OF REMOTE NURSING INTERVENTIONS BASED ON THE EMPOWERMENT PROCESS MODEL ON PEOPLE WITH DEMENTIA AND THEIR FAMILY CAREGIVERS), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07010874 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The effect of remote nursing interventions based on the empowerment process model on people with dementia and their family caregivers: a mixed methods study

TypeinterventionalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsDementia of Alzheimer TypeArmsREMOTE NURSING INTERVENTIONS BASED ON THE EMPOWERMENT PROCESS MODEL
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A randomized trial of two online platforms for dementia family caregivers: GamePlan4Care and Resources4Care.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sofia Bastoni *Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5002-7998
Christian Wrede *Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5748-7089
Marcia Cristina da SilvaDepartment of Psychology, Health & Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9651-1272
Robbert SandermanDepartment of Psychology, Health & Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0823-1159
Andrea GaggioliDepartment of Psychology, Universitá Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7818-7598
Annemarie Braakman-JansenDepartment of Psychology, Health & Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6430-3946
Lisette van Gemert-PijnenDepartment of Psychology, Health & Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-7240
University of Twente · NLUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe worldwide increase in community-dwelling people with dementia underscores the need for innovative eHealth technologies that aim to provide support to both patients and their informal caregivers in the home setting. However, sustainable implementation of eHealth technologies within this target group can be difficult.

objectiveThe goal of this study was to gain a thorough understanding of why it is often difficult to implement eHealth technologies in practice, even though numerous technologies are designed to support people with dementia and their informal caregivers at home. In particular, our study aimed to (1) provide an overview of technologies that have been used and studied in the context of informal dementia care and (2) explore factors influencing the implementation of these technologies.

methodsFollowing an umbrella review design, five different databases were searched (PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane) for (systematic) reviews. Among 2205 reviews retrieved, 21 were included in our analysis based on our screening and selection procedure. A combination of deductive and inductive thematic analyses was performed, using the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework for organizing the findings.

resultsWe identified technologies designed to be used "by informal caregivers," "by people with dementia," and "with people with dementia." Within those groups, most of the represented technologies included, respectively: (i) devices for in-home monitoring of lifestyle, health, and safety; (ii) technologies for supporting memory, orientation, and day structure; and (iii) technologies to facilitate communication between the informal caregiver and person with dementia. Most of the identified factors influencing implementation related to the condition of dementia, characteristics of the technology, expected/perceived value of users, and characteristics of the informal caregiver. Considerably less information has been reported on factors related to the implementing organization and technology supplier, wider institutional and sociocultural context of policy and regulations, and continued adaptation of technology over time.

conclusionsOur study offers a comprehensive overview of eHealth technologies in the context of informal dementia care and contributes to gaining a better understanding of a broad range of factors influencing their implementation. Our results uncovered a knowledge gap regarding success factors for implementation related to the organizational and broader context and continuous adaptation over the long term. Although future research is needed, the current findings can help researchers and stakeholders in improving the development and implementation of eHealth technologies to support informal dementia care.

Indexed as

assistive technologiesdementiaeHealthhome careimplementationinformal care

Identifiers

PMID34623314
PMCPMC8538023
OpenAlexW3183185361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.