Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34623308›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Using Electronic Health Record-Based Clinical Decision Support to Provide Social Risk-Informed Care in Community Health Centers: Protocol for the Design and Assessment of a Clinical Decision Support Tool.

Rachel Gold, Christina Sheppler, Danielle Hessler, Arwen Bunce, Erika Cottrell, Nadia Yosuf, Maura Pisciotta, Rose Gunn, Michael Leo, Laura Gottlieb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Stressful life events in electronic health records: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Partner-developed electronic health record tools to facilitate social risk-informed care planning.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rachel GoldKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6326-5012
Christina ShepplerKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-850X
Danielle HesslerUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4568-6953
Arwen BunceOCHIN, Inc., Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2243-972X
Erika CottrellOCHIN, Inc., Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0481-4485
Nadia YosufKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2977-4504
Maura PisciottaOCHIN, Inc., Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3120-798X
Rose GunnOCHIN, Inc., Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2673-0699
Michael LeoKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7052-8183
Laura GottliebUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2669-4066

Funding

COHERE – COntextualized care in cHcs’ Electronic health RecordsR01MD014886 · NIMHD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GOLD, RACHEL, GOTTLIEB, LAURA · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD014886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsistent and compelling evidence demonstrates that social and economic adversity has an impact on health outcomes. In response, many health care professional organizations recommend screening patients for experiences of social and economic adversity or social risks-for example, food, housing, and transportation insecurity-in the context of care. Guidance on how health care providers can act on documented social risk data to improve health outcomes is nascent. A strategy recommended by the National Academy of Medicine involves using social risk data to adapt care plans in ways that accommodate patients' social risks.

objectiveThis study's aims are to develop electronic health record (EHR)-based clinical decision support (CDS) tools that suggest social risk-informed care plan adaptations for patients with diabetes or hypertension, assess tool adoption and its impact on selected clinical quality measures in community health centers, and examine perceptions of tool usability and impact on care quality.

methodsA systematic scoping review and several stakeholder activities will be conducted to inform development of the CDS tools. The tools will be pilot-tested to obtain user input, and their content and form will be revised based on this input. A randomized quasi-experimental design will then be used to assess the impact of the revised tools. Eligible clinics will be randomized to a control group or potential intervention group; clinics will be recruited from the potential intervention group in random order until 6 are enrolled in the study. Intervention clinics will have access to the CDS tools in their EHR, will receive minimal implementation support, and will be followed for 18 months to evaluate tool adoption and the impact of tool use on patient blood pressure and glucose control.

resultsThis study was funded in January 2020 by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health. Formative activities will take place from April 2020 to July 2021, the CDS tools will be developed between May 2021 and November 2022, the pilot study will be conducted from August 2021 to July 2022, and the main trial will occur from December 2022 to May 2024. Study data will be analyzed, and the results will be disseminated in 2024.

conclusionsPatients' social risk information must be presented to care teams in a way that facilitates social risk-informed care. To our knowledge, this study is the first to develop and test EHR-embedded CDS tools designed to support the provision of social risk-informed care. The study results will add a needed understanding of how to use social risk data to improve health outcomes and reduce disparities. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/31733.

Indexed as

community health centersdecision support systems, clinicalelectronic health recordshealth status disparitiessocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID34623308
PMCPMC8538020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.