ArticleACS synthetic biology2021
A Loser-Take-All DNA Circuit.
Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concept, development and applications of DNA computation.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- Pattern recognition in living cells through the lens of machine learning.Open biology · 2025Review
- Breast Tumor Diagnosis Based on Molecular Learning Vector Quantization Neural Networks.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- A spatially localized DNA linear classifier for cancer diagnosis.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Mapping Temporally Ordered Inputs to Binary Message Outputs with a DNA Temporal Logic Circuit.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- DNA-based customized functional modules for signal transformation.Frontiers in chemistry · 2023Review
- Operant conditioning of stochastic chemical reaction networks.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA-based neural networks are a type of DNA circuit capable of molecular pattern recognition tasks. Winner-take-all DNA networks have been developed to scale up the complexity of molecular pattern recognition with a simple molecular implementation. This simplicity was achieved by replacing negative weights in individual neurons with lateral inhibition and competition across neurons, eliminating the need for dual-rail representation. Here we introduce a new type of DNA circuit that is called loser-take-all: an output signal is ON if and only if the corresponding input has the smallest analog value among all inputs. We develop a DNA strand-displacement implementation of loser-take-all circuits that is cascadable without dual-rail representation, maintaining the simplicity desired for scalability. We characterize the impact of effective signal concentrations and reaction rates on the circuit performance, and derive solutions for compensating undesired signal loss and rate differences. Using these approaches, we successfully demonstrate a three-input loser-take-all circuit with nine unique input combinations. Complementary to winner-take-all, loser-take-all DNA circuits could be used for recognition of molecular patterns based on their least similarities to a set of memories, allowing classification decisions for patterns that are extremely noisy. Moreover, the design principle of loser-take-all could be more generally applied in other DNA circuit implementations including k-winner-take-all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.