Observational studyMedicine2021
The prevention of postoperative port-site adhesion following single-port access (SPA) laparoscopic surgeries.
Observational study in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative abdominopelvic adhesion and umbilical wound validation after single-port laparoscopy or two-port laparoscopy for gynecological surgery: a comparison with conventional laparoscopy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- A Personalized Approach to Adhesion Prevention in Single-Port Access Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Adhesion Barriers and Patient-Specific Risk Factors.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Novel Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Endometriosis and Adenomyosis: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- HerbalFrontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractNo studies have examined the issue of intraabdominal port-site adhesion following single-port access (SPA) laparoscopic surgeries. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the clinical effects of temperature-sensitive adhesion barrier solution in preventing periumbilical adhesion in SPA laparoscopy. This was a prospective, single-arm study in which patients were given GUARDIX-SGTM after SPA laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic diseases. One gram of GUARDIX-SGTM was applied on the abdominal viscera just below the umbilical port site and adjacent abdominal wall prior to fascia closure. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative adhesion evaluated by visceral sliding technique through transabdominal sonography after three months. Between June 2019 and March 2020, a total of 37 healthy patients without any history of previous abdominal surgery received SPA laparoscopic surgery by a single surgeon. No postoperative complications such as wound dehiscence or surgical site infection occurred during the follow-up period of three months. No postoperative adhesion around the umbilicus was noted in all 37 patients. The mean visceral movement measured by transabdominal sonography during maximal respiration was 4.9 cm (4.9 ± 1.9 cm). Using an adhesion barrier around the port site prior to fascia closure prevents postoperative adhesion in benign SPA laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.