Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34622779›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Memory recall involves a transient break in excitatory-inhibitory balance.

Renée S Koolschijn, Anna Shpektor, William T Clarke, I Betina Ip, David Dupret, Uzay E Emir, Helen C Barron

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Excitation-inhibition homeostasis in Alzheimer's disease: a selective multiscale review of mechanisms, sex differences, and therapeutic opportunities.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A compressed code for memory discrimination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renée S Koolschijn *Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, FMRIB, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9553-4213
Anna Shpektor *Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, FMRIB, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
William T ClarkeWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, FMRIB, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7159-7025
I Betina IpWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, FMRIB, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3544-0711
David DupretMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0040-1766
Uzay E EmirWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, FMRIB, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5376-0431
Helen C BarronWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, FMRIB, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4575-6472
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N0059TX/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12024/3Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 203836/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain has a remarkable capacity to acquire and store memories that can later be selectively recalled. These processes are supported by the hippocampus which is thought to index memory recall by reinstating information stored across distributed neocortical circuits. However, the mechanism that supports this interaction remains unclear. Here, in humans, we show that recall of a visual cue from a paired associate is accompanied by a transient increase in the ratio between glutamate and GABA in visual cortex. Moreover, these excitatory-inhibitory fluctuations are predicted by activity in the hippocampus. These data suggest the hippocampus gates memory recall by indexing information stored across neocortical circuits using a disinhibitory mechanism.

Indexed as

Mental RecallNeural InhibitionNeuronal PlasticityAcoustic StimulationAssociationAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingCuesFemalegamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopygamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic Acidexcitatory-inhibitory balancefMRIfMRShippocampal-cortical interactionshippocampushumanmemoryneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID34622779
PMCPMC8516417
OpenAlexW3204125781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.