ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2021
[Retrospective Study of Mite-Specific Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Children].
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy and influencing factors of children receiving mite-specific subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT).
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of children who had received mite SCIT for 3 years at the Desensitization Center of our hospital. We used the daily medication score (DMS) to evaluate the medication use status (the higher the score, the higher the amount of medications given and the less satisfactorily was the primary disease controlled) and we used the visual analogue scale (VAS) to evaluate clinical symptoms (the higher the score, the more severe the symptoms). Evaluation was performed after the first SCIT treatment and after treatment was given for 3 months, 4 months, 12 months, and 3 years. According to whether medication for the primary disease was stopped after 3 years, the patients were divided into two groups, the discontinued medication group (discontinued group) and the continued medication group (continued group). The general data, DMS, VAS and the decline rate of the two groups were compared, and logistic regression was performed to analyze the influencing factors of the outcome.
resultsA total of 711 children were enrolled in the study, with an average age of 8.38 years at the time of the first visit to the hospital. There were 442 males and 269 females. Skin prick test showed that 445 cases only had mite allergy, and 266 cases had mite allergy combined with other allergies. 360 cases have discontinued the medication for the primary disease after 3 years, and 351 cases had relieved symptoms, but still needed to continue with the medication. At the beginning of SCIT treatment, the DMS and VAS of the discontinued group were lower than those of the continued group (
conclusionsMite SCIT can help relieve clinical symptoms and reduce the use of medication for symptomatic treatment. Symptoms can be improved after 3 months of SCIT, with the fastest improvement shown in nasal and eye symptoms. It is not recommended to discontinue the medication for the primary disease for too much after 1 year of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.