Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34622525›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2022

Frailty measurements in hospitalised orthopaedic populations age 65 and older: A scoping review.

Inthira Roopsawang, Oleg Zaslavsky, Hilaire Thompson, Suparb Aree-Ue, Rick Yiu Cho Kwan, Basia Belza

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Methodological quality of 100 recent systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments: an overview of reviews.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Adverse outcomes following pelvic fracture: the critical role of frailty.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Development of a Frailty Index in the Irish Hip Fracture Database.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023
    Article
  13. A nationwide analysis on the interaction between frailty and beta-blocker therapy in hip fracture patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Inthira RoopsawangRamathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8936-1627
Oleg ZaslavskyDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Hilaire ThompsonDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Suparb Aree-UeRamathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5232-219X
Rick Yiu Cho KwanCentre for Gerontological Nursing, School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Basia BelzaDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USMahidol University · THHong Kong Polytechnic University · HK

Funding

Ramathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universitythe de Tornyay Center for Healthy Aging, University of Washington, Seattle
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTo identify and compare frailty instruments used with hospitalised orthopaedic patients aged over 65.

backgroundFrailty predicts clinical events in orthopaedic patients aged over 65. However, the strengths and limitations of different approaches to measuring frailty in this population are rarely discussed. As such, a comprehensive review to address the gap is needed.

designScoping review using Arksey and O'Malley framework.

methodsPubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus and EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies published from 2006 to 2020 regarding frailty instruments in older orthopaedic patients. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses were followed.

resultsThe initial search resulted in 1,471 articles. After review against inclusion and exclusion criteria, a final set of 31 articles containing 15 unique frailty instruments were evaluated. Most of the articles were from Western countries. Fried's phenotype and Frailty Index were commonly used. The frailty index was mostly modified to measure frailty. In hip fracture, physical function items were frequently modified in the measurement of frailty. Trained physicians and nurses administered most frailty instruments. Frailty screening was commonly conducted at hospital admission and used to prognosticate both postoperative complications and hospital outcomes. Most instruments could be completed within 10 min. Reported psychometrics had acceptable reliability and validity.

conclusionMany reliable frailty measures have been used in the inpatient orthopaedic settings; however, evidence is still lacking for a gold standard frailty instrument. More research is needed to identify the best-performing measure. Frailty evaluation in patients with physical limitations is challenging with existing instruments. Clinical context, resources required and instrument quality are essential factors in selecting a frailty instrument. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Musculoskeletal symptoms in older patients may bias frailty assessment. Proactive frailty screening with valid and practical instruments is vital to strengthen preoperative risk stratification and improve post-surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

FrailtyOrthopedicsAgedHospitalsHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of Resultsagedfrailtyhospitalmeasurementolder adultsorthopaedicoutcomespatientsscoping reviewsurgical

Identifiers

PMID34622525
PMCPMC9293223
OpenAlexW3202308991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.