Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34622381›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

High-resolution deep transferred ASPPU-Net for nuclei segmentation of histopathology images.

Amit Kumar Chanchal, Shyam Lal, Jyoti Kini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amit Kumar ChanchalDepartment of E&C Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Mangaluru, Karnataka, 575025, India.
Shyam LalDepartment of E&C Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Mangaluru, Karnataka, 575025, India. shyam.mtec@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4355-6354
Jyoti KiniDepartment of Pathology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Mangalore, Manipal, India.
National Institute of Technology Karnataka · INManipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

This research work was supported in part by the Science Engineering and Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India Grant No. EEG/2018/000323, 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncreasing cancer disease incidence worldwide has become a major public health issue. Manual histopathological analysis is a common diagnostic method for cancer detection. Due to the complex structure and wide variability in the texture of histopathology images, it has been challenging for pathologists to diagnose manually those images. Automatic segmentation of histopathology images to diagnose cancer disease is a continuous exploration field in recent times. Segmentation and analysis for diagnosis of histopathology images by using an efficient deep learning algorithm are the purpose of the proposed method.

methodTo improve the segmentation performance, we proposed a deep learning framework that consists of a high-resolution encoder path, an atrous spatial pyramid pooling bottleneck module, and a powerful decoder. Compared to the benchmark segmentation models having a deep and thin path, our network is wide and deep that effectively leverages the strength of residual learning as well as encoder-decoder architecture.

resultsWe performed careful experimentation and analysis on three publically available datasets namely kidney dataset, Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) dataset, and MoNuSeg histopathology image dataset. We have used the two most preferred performance metrics called F1 score and aggregated Jaccard index (AJI) to evaluate the performance of the proposed model. The measured values of F1 score and AJI score are (0.9684, 0.9394), (0.8419, 0.7282), and (0.8344, 0.7169) on the kidney dataset, TNBC histopathology dataset, and MoNuSeg dataset, respectively.

conclusionOur proposed method yields better results as compared to benchmark segmentation methods on three histopathology datasets. Visual segmentation results justify the high value of the F1 score and AJI scores which indicated that it is a very good prediction by our proposed model.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedCell NucleusDisease ProgressionHumansDeep learningDilated convolutionHistopathology imageNuclei segmentation

Identifiers

PMID34622381
OpenAlexW3202703479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.