Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34622376›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2022

Extending INR testing intervals in warfarin patients at a multi-center anticoagulation clinic.

Michelle Papala, Deborah Gillard, Jennifer Hardman, Teresa Romano, Lisa E Rein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle PapalaFroedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Hospital, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. michelle.papala@froedtert.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9962-4280
Deborah GillardAnticoagulation Clinic, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Hospital, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Jennifer HardmanAmbulatory Pharmacy Services, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Hospital, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Teresa RomanoAnticoagulation and Rheumatology Clinic, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Hospital, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Lisa E ReinDivision of Biostatistics, Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Froedtert Hospital · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Warfarin has been used as an anticoagulant by millions of patients due to its effectiveness, availability, and low cost. Evidence on the safe extension of international normalized ratio (INR) testing frequency remains an area of interest, especially during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to safely extend INR testing intervals in patients throughout a multisite, system-wide anticoagulation clinic. Updates were made to the pharmacist's collaborative practice agreement (CPA) and nurse protocol to optimize practice and allow INR testing interval extension up to a maximum of 8-weeks. The primary outcome was the change in duration between INR tests (INR testing interval) measured before and after providing staff education on clinic updates. The mean duration between INR tests (SD) was 23.69 days (11.29) in the pre-intervention period and 25.58 days (13.91) in the post-intervention period. During the COVID-19 pandemic (post2), intervals were extended further to 27.81 days (14.96), demonstrating a statistically significant increase in INR testing interval from pre-intervention to post-intervention and to post2 (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). A secondary outcome indicated the mean time in therapeutic range (SD) showed no significant difference in pre-intervention 70.11% (25.95) versus post-intervention of 69.76% (25.69) with a difference of - 0.35% (29.93) (p = 0.956) or versus the post2 of 68.82% (27.20) with a difference of - 1.29% (33.20) (p = 0.120). This study showed that changes to the CPA and protocol allowed for a significant increase in INR testing interval while simultaneously maintaining a mean time in therapeutic range > 60% for the clinic population.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentWarfarinAnticoagulantsHumansInternational Normalized RatioPandemicsAnticoagulantsWarfarinCollaborative practice agreementCOVID-19 pandemicINR testing intervalProtocolTime in therapeutic range (TTR)Warfarin

Identifiers

PMID34622376
PMCPMC8497144
OpenAlexW3203543416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.