Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34622346›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2021

Cluster Gauss-Newton and CellNOpt Parameter Estimation in a Small Protein Signaling Network of Vorinostat and Bortezomib Pharmacodynamics.

Jin Niu, Van Anh Nguyen, Mohammad Ghasemi, Ting Chen, Donald E Mager

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jin NiuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University At Buffalo, State University of New York, 431 Pharmacy Building, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Van Anh NguyenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University At Buffalo, State University of New York, 431 Pharmacy Building, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Mohammad GhasemiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University At Buffalo, State University of New York, 431 Pharmacy Building, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Ting ChenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University At Buffalo, State University of New York, 431 Pharmacy Building, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Donald E MagerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University At Buffalo, State University of New York, 431 Pharmacy Building, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA. dmager@buffalo.edu.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Tumor priming sequences combined with novel nanoparticle drug carriers for enhanced therapeutic efficacy in pancreatic cancer: a tripartite USA/Northern Ireland/Republic of Ireland consortiumR01CA198096 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI CLYNES, MARTIN, MA, WEN WEE · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
Large-scale proteome-wide analysis with high accuracy/precision to guide pancreatic cancer therapy developmentR21CA234775 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MAGER, DONALD E, QU, JUN · 2019 to 2020
$399k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA198096NCI NIH HHS R21 CA234775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ordinary differential equation (ODE)-based models of signal transduction pathways often contain parameters that are unidentifiable or unmeasurable by experimental data, and calibrating such models to data remains challenging. Here, two efficient parameter estimation methods, cluster Gauss-Newton (CGN) and CellNOpt (CNO), were applied to fit a signaling network model of U266 multiple myeloma cells to the activity dynamics of key proteins in response to vorinostat and/or bortezomib. A logic-based network model was constructed and transformed to 17 ODEs with 79 parameters estimated within broad ranges of biologically plausible values. The top 10% best-fit parameters by both methods had high uncertainties with CV > 50% for the majority of parameters. The root mean square and prediction errors were comparable without statistically significant differences between the two methods. Despite uncertain parameter estimation, protein dynamics after the sequential combination of bortezomib and vorinostat was predicted with reasonable accuracy and precision. Global sensitivity analyses of partial rank correlation coefficients and Sobol sensitivity demonstrated that apoptosis induction was most sensitive to parameters governing the activity of the proteasome-JNK-caspase-8 axis. Simulations revealed that the greatest magnitude of pharmacodynamic drug interactions between bortezomib and vorinostat occurred at caspase-9, AKT, and Bcl-2. Two sequential combinations were explored in silico, and the outcome matched qualitatively with an empirical evaluation of the pharmacodynamic interaction based on cell viability. Overall, the CGN and CNO algorithms performed similarly for this ODE-based network model calibration, and the calibrated model provided meaningful insights into cellular signaling mechanisms in response to pharmacological perturbations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsBortezomibCell Line, TumorComputer SimulationDrug InteractionsHumansModels, TheoreticalMultiple MyelomaSignal TransductionVorinostatAntineoplastic AgentsBortezomibVorinostatCellNOptRCluster Gauss–Newton methodDrug–drug interactionNetwork modelingParameter estimation

Identifiers

PMID34622346
PMCPMC8653504
OpenAlexW3201817707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.