Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34622328›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2021

Review of Radiofrequency Ablation for Peripheral Nerves.

Kristina Michaud, Peter Cooper, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Lynn Kohan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristina MichaudDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Peter CooperDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Alaa Abd-ElsayedDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Lynn KohanDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA. Lrk9g@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0407-806X
University of Virginia · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) has become an increasingly widespread treatment tool for various chronic pain syndromes within the last two decades with the majority of publications on the topic coming after 2006. Not only are clinicians using RFA to treat more peripheral nerve pain syndromes but the technology itself is evolving quickly to the point that it is nearly impossible to stay abreast on the complexity of such a diversely utilized instrument. This review summarizes studies that focus on the use of RFA for peripheral nerve neurotomy and anatomical studies regarding RFA published between 2015 and 2020. RECENT

findingsTopics in this review include anatomical regions or nerves of the body published since 2015. Significant findings are summarized in each section. Peripheral nerve RFA is rapidly changing. Many studies have been performed over the last 5 years showing the usefulness of RFA.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationChronic PainRadiofrequency AblationHumansPeripheral NervesChronic pain treatmentNeuroablationNeurotomyPeripheral nervePulsed radiofrequencyRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID34622328
OpenAlexW3202200018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.