Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34622305›Full record

ArticleHNO2022

[ToSkORL: self- and objective assessment of examination skills in the head and neck region].

Kariem Sharaf, Axelle Felicio-Briegel, Magdalena Widmann, Johanna Huber, Tanja Kristina Eggersmann, Ursula Stadlberger, Florian Schrötzlmair, Martin Canis, Axel Lechner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kariem SharafKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, LMU Klinikum, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. Kariem.Sharaf@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Axelle Felicio-BriegelKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, LMU Klinikum, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Magdalena WidmannKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, LMU Klinikum, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Johanna HuberInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, LMU Klinikum, Pettenkoferstraße 8a, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Tanja Kristina EggersmannKlinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, LMU München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Ursula StadlbergerInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, LMU Klinikum, Pettenkoferstraße 8a, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Florian SchrötzlmairKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, LMU Klinikum, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Martin CanisKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, LMU Klinikum, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Axel LechnerKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, LMU Klinikum, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. Axel.Lechner@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA central goal of medical school is acquisition of theoretical and practical competences. However, evidence on how capacity acquisition can be measured for special examination techniques is scarce. ToSkORL (Teaching of Skills in Otorhinolaryngology) is a project aimed at scientifically and didactically investigating students' self-evaluation skills in otorhinolaryngologic and head and neck examination techniques.

methodsDuring the examination techniques course, a standardized oral and practical exam for nine different techniques was conducted. Using Likert scales, self-evaluation was based on questionnaires before the clinical skills exam and objective evaluation was performed by the examiners during the examination using a checklist. Self- and objective evaluation were correlated. Nine different examination skills were assessed 42 times each by a total of 91 students.

resultsSelf-evaluation of competence in the different examination skills varied widely. Nevertheless, self- and objective evaluation correlated well overall, independent of age and gender. Students highly interested in otorhinolaryngology rated their own skills higher but tended toward overestimation. For examination items with intermediate difficulty, the highest divergences between self- and objective evaluation were found.

conclusionStudent self-evaluations are an appropriate instrument for measuring competences in otorhinolaryngologic examinations. Instructors should focus on items with allegedly intermediate difficulty, which are most often over- and underestimated.

Indexed as

OtolaryngologyStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceHeadHumansNeckPhysical ExaminationENT examinationMedical educationMedical trainingStudent self-assessmentTeaching evaluation

Identifiers

PMID34622305
PMCPMC8964619
OpenAlexW3203299422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.