ArticleHNO2022
[ToSkORL: self- and objective assessment of examination skills in the head and neck region].
Article in HNO, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Misjudgment of Skills in Clinical Examination Increases in Medical Students Due to a Shift to Exclusively Online Studies during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA central goal of medical school is acquisition of theoretical and practical competences. However, evidence on how capacity acquisition can be measured for special examination techniques is scarce. ToSkORL (Teaching of Skills in Otorhinolaryngology) is a project aimed at scientifically and didactically investigating students' self-evaluation skills in otorhinolaryngologic and head and neck examination techniques.
methodsDuring the examination techniques course, a standardized oral and practical exam for nine different techniques was conducted. Using Likert scales, self-evaluation was based on questionnaires before the clinical skills exam and objective evaluation was performed by the examiners during the examination using a checklist. Self- and objective evaluation were correlated. Nine different examination skills were assessed 42 times each by a total of 91 students.
resultsSelf-evaluation of competence in the different examination skills varied widely. Nevertheless, self- and objective evaluation correlated well overall, independent of age and gender. Students highly interested in otorhinolaryngology rated their own skills higher but tended toward overestimation. For examination items with intermediate difficulty, the highest divergences between self- and objective evaluation were found.
conclusionStudent self-evaluations are an appropriate instrument for measuring competences in otorhinolaryngologic examinations. Instructors should focus on items with allegedly intermediate difficulty, which are most often over- and underestimated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.