Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34622303›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2021

[Treatment recommendations for early esophageal cancer : Endoscopic and surgical options].

T Schlosser, A Hoffmeister, J Feisthammel, S Niebisch, R Thieme, I Gockel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T SchlosserBereich Gastroenterologie, Klinik für Onkologie, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Deutschland.
A HoffmeisterBereich Gastroenterologie, Klinik für Onkologie, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Deutschland.
J FeisthammelBereich Gastroenterologie, Klinik für Onkologie, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Deutschland.
S NiebischKlinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Department für Operative Medizin (DOPM), Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
R ThiemeKlinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Department für Operative Medizin (DOPM), Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
I GockelKlinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Department für Operative Medizin (DOPM), Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. ines.gockel@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
University Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal cancer represents a complex tumor entity with an increasing proportion of adenocarcinomas. Early esophageal cancer is staged as m1-m3 depending on the depth of infiltration into the mucosa and as sm1-sm3 depending on invasion into the submucosa. The risk of lymph node metastasis is strongly correlated with the depth of invasion and increases by leaps and bounds with submucosal infiltration. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis review is based on publications retrieved by a selective database search (MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number, ISRCTN, registry) on the current management of early esophageal cancer.

resultsThe endoscopic diagnostics and evaluation of the dignity of superficial esophageal cancer by traditional staining techniques have been expanded by virtual chromoendoscopy. Endoscopic resection is the diagnostic and therapeutic procedure of choice for mucosal low risk adenocarcinomas (grade 1 or 2, no blood or lymph vessel invasion). Under certain prerequisites adenocarcinomas of the upper submucosa (sm1) can also be endoscopically removed. All other stages necessitate surgical treatment. In squamous cell carcinoma without risk factors a surgical oncological esophageal resection is indicated after infiltration of the third mucosal layer (m3). Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) shows high rates of en bloc and R0 (curative) resections even with large lesions.

conclusionBorderline cases between endoscopic and surgical treatment of early esophageal cancer necessitate an interdisciplinary approach and individually adapted management, which in the locally advanced stage are always embedded in a multimodal concept.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyEsophagoscopyHumansLymphatic MetastasisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic mucosal resectionEndoscopic submucosal dissectionEsophagectomySuperficial esophageal neoplasmSurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID34622303
OpenAlexW3204872833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.