ArticleJournal of drug design and research2017
Sex Differences in the Motivational Contrast between Sucrose and Cocaine in Rats.
Article in Journal of drug design and research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting alcohol consumption and reward sensitivity using responses for natural sucrose reward in non-food-restricted rats.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- The positive reinforcing effects of cocaine and opposite-sex social contact: roles of biological sex and estrus.Psychopharmacology · 2025Article
- Circulating ovarian hormones interact with protein interacting with C kinase (PICK1) within the medial prefrontal cortex to influence cocaine seeking in female mice.Hormones and behavior · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There are sex differences in the vulnerability to cocaine abuse and addiction. Understanding the differences is critical for developing the sex-tailored prevention and treatment strategies. Cocaine addiction is characterized by the pathological motivation for cocaine accompanied by the diminished motivation for natural rewards. Thus, the motivational impact of cocaine relative to natural rewards likely determines the attractiveness of cocaine and likely plays a role in the vulnerability to cocaine abuse and addiction. This study aimed to determine whether the relative magnitudes or contrast of the motivational impact between cocaine and sucrose is different between sexes. To this end, cocaine-naïve out bred Wistar rats were trained to self-administer sucrose pellets and the motivation for different amounts of sucrose was then determined as the breakpoints under the progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement. Following the sucrose tests, the same rats were trained to self-administer cocaine and the motivation for different doses of cocaine was similarly measured. For the female rats, the motivation was also measured during the diestrus and proestrus/estrus, respectively, to determine the impact of the estrous cycle on the motivational effects of cocaine and sucrose. The differences between the breakpoints of cocaine and sucrose were significantly larger in the males. The enhanced motivational contrast may contribute to the increased vulnerability to recreational cocaine abuse and addiction in the males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34622250PMC8494449W3203895385What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.