Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34622250›Full record

ArticleJournal of drug design and research2017

Sex Differences in the Motivational Contrast between Sucrose and Cocaine in Rats.

Udita Datta, Mariangela Martini, Wen Lin Sun

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of drug design and research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Udita DattaDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, USA.
Mariangela MartiniDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, USA.
Wen Lin SunDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, USA.
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Cocaine addiction: neuropharmacological mechanisms of compulsive cocaine useR01DA034776 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI SUN, WENLIN · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are sex differences in the vulnerability to cocaine abuse and addiction. Understanding the differences is critical for developing the sex-tailored prevention and treatment strategies. Cocaine addiction is characterized by the pathological motivation for cocaine accompanied by the diminished motivation for natural rewards. Thus, the motivational impact of cocaine relative to natural rewards likely determines the attractiveness of cocaine and likely plays a role in the vulnerability to cocaine abuse and addiction. This study aimed to determine whether the relative magnitudes or contrast of the motivational impact between cocaine and sucrose is different between sexes. To this end, cocaine-naïve out bred Wistar rats were trained to self-administer sucrose pellets and the motivation for different amounts of sucrose was then determined as the breakpoints under the progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement. Following the sucrose tests, the same rats were trained to self-administer cocaine and the motivation for different doses of cocaine was similarly measured. For the female rats, the motivation was also measured during the diestrus and proestrus/estrus, respectively, to determine the impact of the estrous cycle on the motivational effects of cocaine and sucrose. The differences between the breakpoints of cocaine and sucrose were significantly larger in the males. The enhanced motivational contrast may contribute to the increased vulnerability to recreational cocaine abuse and addiction in the males.

Indexed as

CocaineMotivational contrastRewardSex differencesSucrose

Identifiers

PMID34622250
PMCPMC8494449
OpenAlexW3203895385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.