ReviewInternational journal of women's dermatology2021
Dermatographism with vulvar symptoms.
Review in International journal of women's dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Case Report of Dermatographia.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dermatographism (DG) is characterized by a localized, inducible, wheal-and-flare response along the distribution of mechanical pressure. We report an illustrative case of DG with vulvar symptoms (DG-VS) and review the literature on this rarely recognized but easily treated etiology of vulvar complaints. A 35-year-old woman presented with a 1-year history of vulvar pruritus unresponsive to antifungal, antibacterial, and steroid treatments. A prior punch biopsy was nondiagnostic. Vulvar examination revealed normal architecture and no cutaneous abnormalities. She was markedly dermatographic with a scratch test. DG-VS was diagnosed. The patient achieved complete symptomatic control on low-dose hydroxyzine. She maintains excellent control at 3.5 years. In the literature, a typical patient with DG-VS is of reproductive age, with several years' history of vulvar symptoms (itching, burning, pain, or swelling) and repeated empiric treatment for infectious/inflammatory etiologies. Exacerbation with sexual activity, menstruation, or wearing tight clothing is characteristic and supports the role of mechanical pressure in inducing focal symptoms. Dermatologic changes to the vulvar skin are rarely noted. DG-VS is diagnosed based on clinical findings, symptom patterns, and a positive scratch test and is treated with antihistamines. DG-VS remains absent from current vulvar disease guidelines. In the complex world of vulvar pain and itch, an etiology so easily screened for and readily treated warrants consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.