ArticleBioMed research international2021
Highly Porous 3D Printed Tantalum Scaffolds Have Better Biomechanical and Microstructural Properties than Titanium Scaffolds.
Article in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress and challenges of tantalum-containing biomaterials in regenerative medicine applications.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical outcomes and feasibility of 3D-printed titanium alloy scaffolds combined with platelet-rich plasma injection in the treatment of long-segment femoral defects.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Advances in 3D-printed scaffold technologies for bone defect repair: materials, biomechanics, and clinical prospects.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Correction to "Highly Porous 3D Printed Tantalum Scaffolds Have Better Biomechanical and Microstructural Properties Than Titanium Scaffolds".BioMed research international · 2025Article
- Progress in the Application of Porous Tantalum Metal in Hip Joint Surgery.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Review
- Soft Tissue Reconstruction and Integration to Implant After Bone-Tumor Resection: A Current Concept Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- [Research progress of three-dimensional printed customized prosthesis and its application in acetabular reconstruction of hip revision surgery].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024Review
- Clinical Application of 3D-Printed Artificial Vertebral Body (3DP AVB): A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Innovative Developments in Lumbar Interbody Cage Materials and Design: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Asian spine journal · 2024Article
- Design considerations for patient-specific bone fixation plates: a literature review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023Review
- Transition metals in angiogenesis - A narrative review.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Tantalum as Trabecular Metal for Endosseous Implantable Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Osteogenic differentiation of 3D-printed porous tantalum with nano-topographic modification for repairing craniofacial bone defects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Carpal bone replacement using personalized 3D printed tantalum prosthesis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Functional engineering strategies of 3D printed implants for hard tissue replacement.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Review
- Article
- The clinical application of customized 3D-printed porous tantalum scaffolds combined with Masquelet's induced membrane technique to reconstruct infective segmental femoral defect.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo test the biomechanical properties of 3D printed tantalum and titanium porous scaffolds.
methodsFour types of tantalum and titanium scaffolds with four alternative pore diameters, #1 (1000-700
resultsUnder uniaxial-compression tests, equivalent stress of tantalum scaffold was 411 ± 1.43 MPa, which was significantly larger than the titanium scaffolds (
conclusion3D printed tantalum scaffolds with varying pore diameters are more similar to actual bone scaffolds compared with titanium scaffolds in biomechanical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.