ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021
Research Progress of Imaging Methods for Detection of Microvascular Angina Pectoris in Diabetic Patients.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Between the Remnant Cholesterol Inflammation Index and Cardiac Syndrome X.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessing the Diagnostic Utility of FDG-PET and HPLC for Detecting Microglia Activation and Inflammation in Alzheimer's Disease.Advanced biomedical research · 2025Review
- Menstruation-Related Angina-The Wee Hours.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2024Review
- Deciphering the Dilemma: Anticoagulation for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).Cureus · 2023Review
- Strengths and weaknesses of alternative noninvasive imaging approaches for microvascular ischemia.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes is a complex metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycemia. Its complications are various, often involving the heart, brain, kidney, and other essential organs. At present, the number of diabetic patients in the world is growing day by day. The cardiovascular disease caused by diabetes has dramatically affected the quality of life of diabetic patients. It is the leading cause of death of diabetic patients. Diabetic patients often suffer from microvascular angina pectoris without obstructive coronary artery disease. Still, there are typical ECG ischemia and angina pectoris, that is, chest pain and dyspnea under exercise. Unlike obstructive coronary diseases, nitrate does not affect chest pain caused by coronary microvascular angina in most cases. With the increasing emphasis on diabetic microvascular angina, the need for accurate diagnosis of the disease is also increasing. We can use SPECT, PET, CMR, MCE, and other methods to evaluate coronary microvascular function. SPECT is commonly used in clinical practice, and PET is considered the gold standard for non-invasive detection of myocardial blood flow. This article mainly introduces the research progress of these imaging methods in detecting microvascular angina in diabetic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.