Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34621713›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

How to Manage Red Alert in Emergency and Disaster Unit in the Hospital? Evidence From London.

Mohammad Heydari, Kin Keung Lai, Zhou Xiaohu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad HeydariBusiness College, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Kin Keung LaiInternational Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Zhou XiaohuThe School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research gave an overview of coordinated hospital planning issues. In these issues, patients desire an arrangement for different source types, ideally as quickly as time permits. This field of context has just picked up academic interest, despite its reality since 1995. The way may discover a clarification for the above aspect that managing the hospital sources is regularly performed separately without taking a bigger picture. Therefore, it is particularly valid if the sources are situated in different departments. Another subsequent clarification may be related to the notoriety of the patient flow context. Hence, patients shouldn't be planned in these issues to be queued for another source or leave the system in case of their satisfaction of solicitation for the services at a particular source. The primary contribution of the present research is assisting present and new scholars via enumeration for every progression of the study of accessible decisions in the present context. Such means could be represented by major references for scientists to discover such studies endeavors tailored to their respective requirements. This principle removes the message: scientists ought to consistently coordinate their decisions concerning the setting, the capacity, and the approaches, as not all blends are conceivable.

Indexed as

DisastersEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalsHumansLondonconsultation planningentropic estimatorImperial College Healthcare NHS trustpatient-flowSCM

Identifiers

PMID34621713
PMCPMC8490805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.