Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34621688›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2021

Procedures for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Murine Microbiome Studies.

Suresh C Bokoliya, Yair Dorsett, Hunter Panier, Yanjiao Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suresh C BokoliyaDepartment of Medicine, University of Connecticut (UConn) Health, Farmington, CT, United States.
Yair DorsettDepartment of Medicine, University of Connecticut (UConn) Health, Farmington, CT, United States.
Hunter PanierDepartment of Medicine, University of Connecticut (UConn) Health, Farmington, CT, United States.
Yanjiao ZhouDepartment of Medicine, University of Connecticut (UConn) Health, Farmington, CT, United States.
UConn Health · US

Funding

Intermittent Fasting-induced Gut Microbiome Modulation of CNS AutoimmunityR01NS102633 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ZHOU, YANJIAO · 2017 to 2022
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been widely recognized as an approach to determine the microbiome's causal role in gut dysbiosis-related disease models and as a novel disease-modifying therapy. Despite potential beneficial FMT results in various disease models, there is a variation and complexity in procedural agreement among research groups for performing FMT. The viability of the microbiome in feces and its successful transfer depends on various aspects of donors, recipients, and lab settings. This review focuses on the technical practices of FMT in animal studies. We first document crucial factors required for collecting, handling, and processing donor fecal microbiota for FMT. Then, we detail the description of gut microbiota depletion methods, FMT dosages, and routes of FMT administrations in recipients. In the end, we describe assessments of success rates of FMT with sustainability. It is critical to work under the anaerobic condition to preserve as much of the viability of bacteria. Utilization of germ- free mice or depletion of recipient gut microbiota by antibiotics or polyethylene glycol are two common recipient preparation approaches to achieve better engraftment. Oral-gastric gavage preferred by most researchers for fast and effective administration of FMT in mice. Overall, this review highlights various methods that may lead to developing the standard and reproducible protocol for FMT.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsDysbiosisFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesMiceengraftmentfecal microbiota transplantationmicemicrobiomeprocedure

Identifiers

PMID34621688
PMCPMC8490673
OpenAlexW3199249615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.