ArticleChonnam medical journal2021
Poor Prognosis of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy during Long Term Follow Up.
Article in Chonnam medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research progress on risk factors and early predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- Contrast-Induced Nephropathy (CIN) After Invasive Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes-Predictors, Short and Long-Term Outcome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The relationship between perioperative serum albumin and contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.BMC nephrology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is known to associate with poor prognosis. However, there have been few studies for long-term follow up. The purpose of this study was to know the prognosis of CIN during a 10-year follow up. We retrospectively analyzed 528 patients who underwent coronary angiography in Jeonbuk National University Hospital (South Korea, Jeonju) between Jan 2005 to Dec 2006. We excluded the patients who required regular dialysis before study enrollment. We compared adverse events in the no CIN (group I, n=485, 61.9±11.4 years, male 64.1%) and CIN (group II, n=43, 65.7±11.1 years, male 62.8%). Baseline clinical characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors were not different between the two groups except the post-procedure creatinine level (1.04 mg/dL vs 1.84 mg/dL, p=0.0001). The higher rates of all-cause death were observed in group II at 1-year (3.7% vs 13.9%, log-rank, p=0.001), 5-years (17.9% vs 34.9%, log-rank, p=0.003), and 10-years (25.3% vs 48.8%, log-rank, p=0.000). MACE was higher in group II at 1-year (3.9% vs 11.6%, log-rank, p=0.013), 5-years (6.8% vs 20.9%, log-rank, p=0.000) and 10-years (13.4% vs 27.9%, log-rank, p=0.000). In addition, CIN was an independent predictor for 10-year MACE (adjusted HR 3.432, 95% CI 1.314-8.965, p=0.012) after propensity score matching. The worse prognosis of CIN was continuously observed after the 10-year follow-up. Our data suggests that it is worthwhile to prevent the appearance of CIN in order to improve longterm results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.