Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34621549›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis international2021

Aquaporin-4 Autoantibody Detection by ELISA: A Retrospective Characterization of a Commonly Used Assay.

Jon P Williams, Justin R Abbatemarco, Jonathan J Galli, Stefanie J Rodenbeck, Lisa K Peterson, Thomas R Haven, Meagan Street, John W Rose, John E Greenlee, M Mateo Paz Soldan and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Cell-based vs enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of anti-Tribbles homolog 2 autoantibodies in Chinese patients with narcolepsy.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jon P WilliamsDepartment of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Justin R AbbatemarcoDepartment of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1668-4753
Jonathan J GalliDepartment of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Stefanie J RodenbeckDepartment of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Lisa K PetersonARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Thomas R HavenARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Meagan StreetARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
John W RoseDepartment of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
John E GreenleeDepartment of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
M Mateo Paz SoldanDepartment of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Stacey L ClardyDepartment of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6600-9428
University of Utah · USARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAquaporin-4 (AQP4) serum autoantibodies are detected by a variety of methods. The highest sensitivity is achieved with cell-based assays, but the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is still commonly utilized by clinicians worldwide.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review to identify all patients at the University of Utah who had AQP4 ELISA testing at ARUP Laboratories from 2010 to 2017. We then reviewed their diagnostic evaluation and final diagnosis based on the ELISA titer result.

resultsA total of 750 tests for the AQP4 ELISA were analyzed, and 47 unique patients with positive titers were identified. Less than half of these patients (49%) met the clinical criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). In cases of low positive titers (3.0-7.9 U/mL,

conclusionsOur data illustrates diagnostic uncertainty associated with the AQP4 ELISA, an assay that is still commonly ordered by clinicians despite the availability of more sensitive and specific tests to detect AQP4 autoantibodies in patients suspected of having NMOSD. In particular, low positive titer AQP4 ELISA results are particularly nonspecific for the diagnosis of NMOSD. The importance of accessibility to both sensitive and specific AQP4 testing cannot be overemphasized in clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID34621549
PMCPMC8492278
OpenAlexW3204802035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.