Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34621542›Full record

ArticleApplied sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Vibration Propagation on the Skin of the Arm.

Valay A Shah, Maura Casadio, Robert A Scheidt, Leigh A Mrotek

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03298243 (Augmenting Kinesthetic Feedback to Improve Hemiparetic Arm Control After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03298243 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Augmenting Kinesthetic Feedback to Improve Hemiparetic Arm Control After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarquette UniversityRan2023 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsStroke, Proprioceptive DisordersArmsVibrotactile stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Valay A ShahDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7485-6894
Maura CasadioDIBRIS, University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2338-8995
Robert A ScheidtDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2024-5051
Leigh A MrotekDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA.
Marquette University · USUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

Control of Arm Posture and Movement Followoing StrokeR01HD053727 · NICHD · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHEIDT, ROBERT A. · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
Augmenting kinesthetic feedback to improve hemiparetic arm control after strokeR15HD093086 · NICHD · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHEIDT, ROBERT A. · 2017 to 2021
$897k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD053727NICHD NIH HHS R15 HD093086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibrotactile interfaces are an inexpensive and non-invasive way to provide performance feedback to body-machine interface users. Interfaces for the upper extremity have utilized a multi-channel approach using an array of vibration motors placed on the upper extremity. However, for successful perception of multi-channel vibrotactile feedback on the arm, we need to account for vibration propagation across the skin. If two stimuli are delivered within a small distance, mechanical propagation of vibration can lead to inaccurate perception of the distinct vibrotactile stimuli. This study sought to characterize vibration propagation across the hairy skin of the forearm. We characterized vibration propagation by measuring accelerations at various distances from a source vibration of variable intensities (100-240 Hz). Our results showed that acceleration from the source vibration was present at a distance of 4 cm at intensities >150 Hz. At distances greater than 8 cm from the source, accelerations were reduced to values substantially below vibrotactile discrimination thresholds for all vibration intensities. We conclude that in future applications of vibrotactile interfaces, stimulation sites should be separated by a distance of at least 8 cm to avoid potential interference in vibration perception caused by propagating vibrations.

Indexed as

upper extremityuser feedbackvibration propagationvibrotactile displays

Identifiers

PMID34621542
PMCPMC8493869
OpenAlexW2980645646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.