ArticleApplied sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Vibration Propagation on the Skin of the Arm.
Article in Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03298243 (Augmenting Kinesthetic Feedback to Improve Hemiparetic Arm Control After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Augmenting Kinesthetic Feedback to Improve Hemiparetic Arm Control After Stroke
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility and User Experience with 3-Dimensional Vibrotactile Kinesthetic Feedback for Improving Reach-to-Grasp Accuracy and Efficiency After Stroke: A Case Series.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2026Trial
- Data-driven design guide for vibrotactile display layouts by continuous mapping.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimality of multisensory integration while compensating for uncertain visual target information with artificial vibrotactile cues during reach planning.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Utility and Usability of Two Forms of Supplemental Vibrotactile Kinesthetic Feedback for Enhancing Movement Accuracy and Efficiency in Goal-Directed Reaching.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Vibrotactile Perception for Sensorimotor Augmentation: Perceptual Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli Induced by Low-Cost Eccentric Rotating Mass Motors at Different Body Locations in Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- Sinusoidal Vibration Source Localization in Two-Dimensional Space Around the Hand.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Tactile spatial discrimination on the torso using vibrotactile and force stimulation.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Integrating Tactile Feedback Technologies Into Home-Based Telerehabilitation: Opportunities and Challenges in Light of COVID-19 Pandemic.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Vibrotactile interfaces are an inexpensive and non-invasive way to provide performance feedback to body-machine interface users. Interfaces for the upper extremity have utilized a multi-channel approach using an array of vibration motors placed on the upper extremity. However, for successful perception of multi-channel vibrotactile feedback on the arm, we need to account for vibration propagation across the skin. If two stimuli are delivered within a small distance, mechanical propagation of vibration can lead to inaccurate perception of the distinct vibrotactile stimuli. This study sought to characterize vibration propagation across the hairy skin of the forearm. We characterized vibration propagation by measuring accelerations at various distances from a source vibration of variable intensities (100-240 Hz). Our results showed that acceleration from the source vibration was present at a distance of 4 cm at intensities >150 Hz. At distances greater than 8 cm from the source, accelerations were reduced to values substantially below vibrotactile discrimination thresholds for all vibration intensities. We conclude that in future applications of vibrotactile interfaces, stimulation sites should be separated by a distance of at least 8 cm to avoid potential interference in vibration perception caused by propagating vibrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.