ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2021
Role of minimally invasive techniques in gastrointestinal surgery: Current status and future perspectives.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06731998 (Evaluating Optimal Perioperative Pain Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating Optimal Perioperative Pain Management: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial of Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Local Anesthetic, Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Alone, and Local Anesthetic Alone in Minimally Invasive Oncologic Surgery
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Mechanomedicine in digestive surgery: a theranostic framework integrating mechanical diagnostics and therapeutic modulation across the perioperative continuum.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Safety and efficacy of fully-covered self-expandable metal stent placement for refractory stomal stenosis.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Gastrointestinal Cancer: Outcomes and Therapeutic Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Laparoendoscopic surgery in gastrointestinal diseases: Status and future perspectives.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Venture Capital Investments in Gastroenterology from 2012 to 2022: A Window into the Future of Gastroenterology.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Nationwide medical database study for postoperative nutritional management in patients undergoing gastroenterological cancer surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- The effect of anticoagulation therapy on the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive major gastrointestinal surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Changes in nutritional management after gastrointestinal cancer surgery over a 12-year period: a cohort study using a nationwide medical claims database.BMC nutrition · 2025Article
- Regulatory role of non-coding RNAs in 5-Fluorouracil resistance in gastrointestinal cancers.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2025Review
- Poor nutritional status based on controlling nutritional status score and nutritional risk index may be related to the occurrence of complications after laparoscopic treatment in patients with gastrointestinal tumors aged no more than 60 years.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Treatment of hemolymphangioma by robotic surgery: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Diverticulitis, surgery, evidence-based medicine, and the Steve Jobs' dots: a narrative review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Review
- Advances in Hydrogel Adhesives for Gastrointestinal Wound Closure and Repair.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the incidence of gastrointestinal cancer has remained high. Currently, surgical resection is still the most effective method for treating gastrointestinal cancer. Traditionally, radical surgery depends on open surgery. However, traditional open surgery inflicts great trauma and is associated with a slow recovery. Minimally invasive surgery, which aims to reduce postoperative complications and accelerate postoperative recovery, has been rapidly developed in the last two decades; it is increasingly used in the field of gastrointestinal surgery and widely used in early-stage gastrointestinal cancer. Nevertheless, many operations for gastrointestinal cancer treatment are still performed by open surgery. One reason for this may be the challenges of minimally invasive technology, especially when operating in narrow spaces, such as within the pelvis or near the upper edge of the pancreas. Moreover, some of the current literature has questioned oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Overall, the current evidence suggests that minimally invasive techniques are safe and feasible in gastrointestinal cancer surgery, but most of the studies published in this field are retrospective studies and case-matched studies. Large-scale randomized prospective studies are needed to further support the application of minimally invasive surgery. In this review, we summarize several common minimally invasive methods used to treat gastrointestinal cancer and discuss the advances in the minimally invasive treatment of gastrointestinal cancer in detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.