Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34621351›Full record

ArticleMaedica2021

COVID-19 Pandemic and Birth Experience. The Monopoly of Caesarean Sections. A Critical Realist Review.

Maria-Eleni Boukoura, Antigoni Sarantaki

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Maedica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria-Eleni BoukouraMidwifery Department, Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Antigoni SarantakiMidwifery Department, Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With over a million people infected, the global pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been growing at an accelerating degree. The rising mortality rate warrants identification and protection of the vulnerable populations in society. Despite the increasing number of published studies on COVID-19 in pregnancy, there are insufficient good-quality data to draw unbiased conclusions with regard to the severity of the disease or specific complications of COVID-19 with reference to the mode of delivery, vertical/peripartum transmission, and complications in neonates, born by infected pregnant women. Data on maternal and perinatal outcomes of women infected with the SARS-CoV-2 are limited to a handful of case reports and series. The sample sizes are small and findings are diverse. Regarding the mode of delivery in women with suspected or confirmed COVID-19, many studies conclude that the rates of Caesarean Section (CS) are higher in these women, despite the guidelines for vaginal labour. The aim of this critical realist review (CRR) is to investigate this phenomenon as well as the role of midwives in birth experience of women with COVID-19.

Identifiers

PMID34621351
PMCPMC8450653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.