Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34621306›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2021

Facial Emotion Recognition Predicts Alexithymia Using Machine Learning.

Nima Farhoumandi, Sadegh Mollaey, Soomaayeh Heysieattalab, Mostafa Zarean, Reza Eyvazpour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Experience in psychological counseling supported by artificial intelligence technology.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nima FarhoumandiDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5283-2963
Sadegh MollaeyDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8480-6946
Soomaayeh HeysieattalabDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8325-4476
Mostafa ZareanDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3451-9292
Reza EyvazpourDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8937-4652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlexithymia, as a fundamental notion in the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders, is characterized by deficits in emotional processing and, consequently, difficulties in emotion recognition. Traditional tools for assessing alexithymia, which include interviews and self-report measures, have led to inconsistent results due to some limitations as insufficient insight. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to propose a new screening tool that utilizes machine learning models based on the scores of facial emotion recognition task.

methodIn a cross-sectional study, 55 students of the University of Tabriz were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and their scores in the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). Then, they completed the somatization subscale of Symptom Checklist-90 Revised (SCL-90-R), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and the facial emotion recognition (FER) task. Afterwards, support vector machine (SVM) and feedforward neural network (FNN) classifiers were implemented using K-fold cross validation to predict alexithymia, and the model performance was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-measure.

resultsThe models yielded an accuracy range of 72.7-81.8% after feature selection and optimization. Our results suggested that ML models were able to accurately distinguish alexithymia and determine the most informative items for predicting alexithymia.

conclusionOur results show that machine learning models using FER task, SCL-90-R, BDI-II, and BAI could successfully diagnose alexithymia and also represent the most influential factors of predicting it and can be used as a clinical instrument to help clinicians in diagnosis process and earlier detection of the disorder.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionAffective SymptomsCross-Sectional StudiesFacial ExpressionHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID34621306
PMCPMC8492233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.