Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34621219›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality.

Nathan C Higgins, Ambar G Monjaras, Breanne D Yerkes, David F Little, Jessica E Nave-Blodgett, Mounya Elhilali, Joel S Snyder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathan C HigginsDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Ambar G MonjarasDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Breanne D YerkesDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
David F LittleDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Jessica E Nave-BlodgettDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Mounya ElhilaliDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Joel S SnyderDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the presence of a continually changing sensory environment, maintaining stable but flexible awareness is paramount, and requires continual organization of information. Determining which stimulus features belong together, and which are separate is therefore one of the primary tasks of the sensory systems. Unknown is whether there is a global or sensory-specific mechanism that regulates the final perceptual outcome of this streaming process. To test the extent of modality independence in perceptual control, an auditory streaming experiment, and a visual moving-plaid experiment were performed. Both were designed to evoke alternating perception of an integrated or segregated percept. In both experiments, transient auditory and visual distractor stimuli were presented in separate blocks, such that the distractors did not overlap in frequency or space with the streaming or plaid stimuli, respectively, thus preventing peripheral interference. When a distractor was presented in the opposite modality as the bistable stimulus (visual distractors during auditory streaming or auditory distractors during visual streaming), the probability of percept switching was not significantly different than when no distractor was presented. Conversely, significant differences in switch probability were observed following within-modality distractors, but only when the pre-distractor percept was segregated. Due to the modality-specificity of the distractor-induced resetting, the results suggest that conscious perception is at least partially controlled by modality-specific processing. The fact that the distractors did not have peripheral overlap with the bistable stimuli indicates that the perceptual reset is due to interference at a locus in which stimuli of different frequencies and spatial locations are integrated.

Indexed as

auditory scene analysisauditory-visual perceptionpsychophysicssensory distractorsstream segregationvisual scene analysis

Identifiers

PMID34621219
PMCPMC8490814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.