ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021
Exploring the Question: "Does Empathy Work in the Same Way in Online and In-Person Therapeutic Settings?"
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Empathic Behavior and Behavioral Synchrony During Video Conversations in Autistic and Non-autistic Adolescents.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Face-to-face" is not superior to "face-to-screen": comparing effects of online and offline communication skills course in postgraduate medical students.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and therapeutic alliance between face-to-face and online psychological interventions. A longitudinal study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Face-to-face, confidential and health worker-led: Understanding the preferences for behavioral health services among people with HIV in Lesotho.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Telepsychology revolution in the mental health care delivery: a global overview of emerging clinical and legal issues.Forensic sciences research · 2024Review
- Digital clinical empathy in a live chat: multiple findings from a formative qualitative study and usability tests.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Association Between Clinician-Level Factors and Patient Outcomes in Virtual and In-Person Outpatient Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: Multilevel Analysis.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- It turned into something else: patients' long-term experiences of transitions to or from telepsychotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The transition to online psychotherapy during the pandemic: a qualitative study on patients' perspectives.Research in psychotherapy (Milano) · 2022Article
- Computational Methods in Psychotherapy: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Creative Arts Therapy in the "Remote Therapeutic Response" Format in the Education System.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Providing remote psychotherapy using technology is a growing practice, especially since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Even if in numerous studies video conferencing psychotherapy (VCP) was found to be clinically effective, some doubts continue to exist about how the psychotherapeutic alliance works in the online setting, and the characteristics of the empathic process are still poorly understood. This is an exploratory study aimed at analyzing the degree of empathy between the psychotherapist and client pair, and the degree of support perceived by the client who shall be referred to as the patient interchangeably in this study, comparing the sessions in person with those online, during the current pandemic, in order to discriminate the impact of empathy in the digital setting. The sample analyzed was composed of 23 patients with different severity of pathology engaged in online and in-person therapeutic sessions with five psychotherapists of different theoretical leanings. The scores of the support and empathy scale, obtained by both members of the psychotherapeutic couple in the two settings, were analyzed and compared. The test used belongs to an Italian adaptation of the Empathic Understanding (EU) of the Relationship Inventory. What emerged from comparing the scores was interesting: Unlike the psychotherapists, the patients perceived their therapists as significantly more empathic and supportive in the remote setting. These are rather important data, because the literature documents that client empathic perception measures represent a more accurate measure of the empathic relationship and, in general, can predict a good treatment outcome. Although these results need further investigation, they represent an important contribution in filling the scientific gap in the understanding of digital empathy. Also, this study provides new insights for future research on the characteristics and impact empathy has on the practice of remote psychotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.