Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34621148›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Optimising Integrated Stroke Care in Regional Networks: A Nationwide Self-Assessment Study in 2012, 2015 and 2019.

Helene R Voogdt-Pruis, Nick Zonneveld, Monique Bergsma, Elize van Wijk, Henk Kerkhoff, Luikje van der Dussen, Maartje Kuijpens, Hubertus J M Vrijhoef, Mirella M N Minkman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helene R Voogdt-PruisUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Julius Global Health, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7801-3897
Nick ZonneveldTilburg University, TIAS School for Business and Society, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0902-1927
Monique BergsmaStroke Knowledge Network Netherlands, Oudlaan 4, 3515 GA Utrecht, Netherlands.
Elize van WijkVilans, National Centre of Expertise in Long-term Care, PO Box 8228, 3503 RE Utrecht, Netherlands.
Henk KerkhoffAlbert Schweitzer Hospital, Department of Neurology, PO Box 444, 3300 AK Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Luikje van der DussenStroke Knowledge Network Netherlands, Oudlaan 4, 3515 GA Utrecht, Netherlands.
Maartje KuijpensStroke Knowledge Network Netherlands, Oudlaan 4, 3515 GA Utrecht, Netherlands.
Hubertus J M VrijhoefStroke Knowledge Network Netherlands, Oudlaan 4, 3515 GA Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5539-4671
Mirella M N MinkmanTilburg University, TIAS School for Business and Society, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-5983
TIAS School for Business and Society · NLTilburg University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo help enhance the quality of integrated stroke care delivery, regional stroke services networks in the Netherlands participated in a self-assessment study in 2012, 2015 and 2019.

methodsCoordinators of the regional stroke services networks filled out an online self-assessment questionnaire in 2012, 2015 and 2019. The questionnaire, which was based on the Development Model for Integrated Care, consisted of 97 questions in nine clusters (themes). Cluster scores were calculated as proportions of the activities implemented. Associations between clusters and features of stroke services were assessed by regression analysis.

resultsThe response rate varied from 93.1% (2012) to 85.5% (2019). Over the years, the regional stroke services networks increased in 'size': the median number of organisations involved and the volume of patients per network increased (7 and 499 in 2019, compared to 5 and 364 in 2012). At the same time, fewer coordinators were appointed for more than 1 day a week in 2019 (35.1%) compared to 2012 (45.9%). Between 2012 and 2019, there were statistically significantly more elements implemented in four out of nine clusters: 'Transparent entrepreneurship' (MD = 18.0% F(1) = 10.693, p = 0.001), 'Roles and tasks' (MD = 14.0% F(1) = 9.255, p = 0.003), 'Patient-centeredness' (MD = 12.9% F(1) = 9.255, p = 0.003), and 'Commitment' (MD = 11.2%, F(1) = 4.982, p = 0.028). A statistically significant positive correlation was found for all clusters between implementation of activities and age of the network. In addition, the number of involved organisations is associated with better execution of implemented activities for 'Transparent entrepreneurship', 'Result-focused learning' and 'Quality of care'. Conversely, there are small but negative associations between the volume of patients and implementation rates for 'Interprofessional teamwork' and 'Patient-centredness'.

conclusionThis long-term analyses of stroke service development in the Netherlands, showed that between 2012 and 2019, integrated care activities within the regional stroke networks increased. Experience in collaboration between organisations within a network benefits the uptake of integrated care activities.

Indexed as

care coordinationcollaborationintegrated careinterprofessional teamworkpatient-centrednessquality improvementstroke services

Identifiers

PMID34621148
PMCPMC8462476
OpenAlexW3200089930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.