ArticleBioinformation2020
Duplication mutation in CHIT1 gene is associated with poor response to medical therapy in patients affected with filarial chyluria.
Article in Bioinformation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We explore the impact of CHIT1 gene mutation on clinical, biochemical parameters and response to outcome (remission/failure) of medical treatment in North Indian filarial chyluria (FC) patients. Data of 101 subjects of FC treated medically between March 2013 and April 2016 in whom CHIT1 gene polymorphism was determined were analyzed. Filarial etiology was confirmed by DEC-provocative test, immuno-chromatographic test and IgG/IgM-combo rapid antibody test. CHIT1 gene polymorphism was genotyped by polymerase chain reaction. Of 101 patients (mean age, 36.9±10.28 years; male: female, 3:1.2), 66 experienced remission (Group-A) while 35 experienced relapse or failed to respond (Group-B). A significant association was observed between CHIT1 genotypes and higher grade of disease (p= 0.001). Wild-type, heterozygous and homozygous mutant frequencies of CHIT1 genotypes were 78.6%, 72.5% and 27.8% in remission and 21.4%, 27.5% and 72.2%, in recurrence/failure, respectively. Our results showed that patients with mutant genotype (TT) of CHIT1 gene showed significantly higher rate of recurrence or failure to medical therapy than wild type (HH) genotypes [OR (95% CI) = 9.53 (1.84-49.21), p=0.011]. This preliminary study showed the impact of CHIT1 gene variants on treatment outcome in FC patients. This observation needs to be confirmed using studies with larger numbers of FC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.