Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34621087›Full record

SynthesisBulletin of the World Health Organization2021

Maternal mortality: near-miss events in middle-income countries, a systematic review.

Anke Heitkamp, Anne Meulenbroek, Jos van Roosmalen, Stefan Gebhardt, Linda Vollmer, Johanna I de Vries, Gerhard Theron, Thomas van den Akker

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Predicting severe maternal outcomes in a network of sentinel sites in Latin-American countries.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Indicators for maternal near miss: an observational study, India.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anke HeitkampDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Francie Van Zijl Avenue, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.
Anne MeulenbroekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jos van RoosmalenAthena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Stefan GebhardtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Francie Van Zijl Avenue, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.
Linda VollmerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Francie Van Zijl Avenue, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.
Johanna I de VriesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Gerhard TheronDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Francie Van Zijl Avenue, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.
Thomas van den AkkerAthena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the incidence and main causes of maternal near-miss events in middle-income countries using the World Health Organization's (WHO) maternal near-miss tool and to evaluate its applicability in these settings.

methodsWe did a systematic review of studies on maternal near misses in middle-income countries published over 2009-2020. We extracted data on number of live births, number of maternal near misses, major causes of maternal near miss and most frequent organ dysfunction. We extracted, or calculated, the maternal near-miss ratio, maternal mortality ratio and mortality index. We also noted descriptions of researchers' experiences and modifications of the WHO tool for local use.

findingsWe included 69 studies from 26 countries (12 lower-middle- and 14 upper-middle-income countries). Studies reported a total of 50 552 maternal near misses out of 10 450 482 live births. Median number of cases of maternal near miss per 1000 live births was 15.9 (interquartile range, IQR: 8.9-34.7) in lower-middle- and 7.8 (IQR: 5.0-9.6) in upper-middle-income countries, with considerable variation between and within countries. The most frequent causes of near miss were obstetric haemorrhage in 19/40 studies in lower-middle-income countries and hypertensive disorders in 15/29 studies in upper-middle-income countries. Around half the studies recommended adaptations to the laboratory and management criteria to avoid underestimation of cases of near miss, as well as clearer guidance to avoid different interpretations of the tool.

conclusionIn several countries, adaptations of the WHO near-miss tool to the local context were suggested, possibly hampering international comparisons, but facilitating locally relevant audits to learn lessons.

Indexed as

Near Miss, HealthcarePregnancy ComplicationsDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansLive BirthMaternal MortalityPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34621087
PMCPMC8477432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.