Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34621081›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers2020

Neurobiologically Inspired Self-Monitoring Systems.

Andrea A Chiba, Jeffrey L Krichmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Design Principles for Neurorobotics.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrea A ChibaDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA.
Jeffrey L KrichmarDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, Department of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697-5100 USA.

Funding

Behavioral, Physiological, and Quantitative Models of Pro-Social BehaviorR01MH110514 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHIBA, ANDREA ANGELIDES, COLEMAN, TODD P · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we explore neurobiological principles that could be deployed in systems requiring self-preservation, adaptive control, and contextual awareness. We start with low-level control for sensor processing and motor reflexes. We then discuss how critical it is at an intermediate level to maintain homeostasis and predict system set points. We end with a discussion at a high-level, or cognitive level, where planning and prediction can further monitor the system and optimize performance. We emphasize the information flow between these levels both from a systems neuroscience and an engineering point of view. Throughout the paper, we describe the brain systems that carry out these functions and provide examples from artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics that include these features. Our goal is to show how biological organisms performing self-monitoring can inspire the design of autonomous and embedded systems.

Indexed as

Adaptive ControlArtificial IntelligenceAttentionHomeostasisMachine LearningNeuroscienceRobotics

Identifiers

PMID34621081
PMCPMC8494143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.