Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34620708›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Capacity of soil bacteria to reach the phyllosphere and convergence of floral communities despite soil microbiota variation.

Julien Massoni, Miriam Bortfeld-Miller, Alex Widmer, Julia A Vorholt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julien MassoniInstitute of Microbiology, Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland; massoni.julien@gmail.com jvorholt@ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-3936-7016
Miriam Bortfeld-MillerInstitute of Microbiology, Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Alex WidmerInstitute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8253-5137
Julia A VorholtInstitute of Microbiology, Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland; massoni.julien@gmail.com jvorholt@ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-6011-4910
ETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaves and flowers are colonized by diverse bacteria that impact plant fitness and evolution. Although the structure of these microbial communities is becoming well-characterized, various aspects of their environmental origin and selection by plants remain uncertain, such as the relative proportion of soilborne bacteria in phyllosphere communities. Here, to address this issue and to provide experimental support for bacteria being filtered by flowers, we conducted common-garden experiments outside and under gnotobiotic conditions. We grew

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBurkholderiaceaeFlowersMicrobiotaPlant LeavesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil MicrobiologyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilbacterial communitiesflowerphyllospheresoil

Identifiers

PMID34620708
PMCPMC8521660
OpenAlexW3203610667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.