Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34620673›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Patients' and psychiatrists' perspectives on clozapine treatment-a scoping review protocol.

Michelle Iris Jakobsen, Ole Jakob Storebø, Stephen Fitzgerald Austin, Jimmi Nielsen, Erik Simonsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Michelle Iris JakobsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kobenhavn, Denmark miij@regionsjaelland.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-9074
Ole Jakob StorebøDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0204-7745
Stephen Fitzgerald AustinEarly Psychosis Intervention Center, Psychiatric Services Region Zealand East, Roskilde, Denmark.
Jimmi NielsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kobenhavn, Denmark.
Erik SimonsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kobenhavn, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKRegion Zealand · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe atypical antipsychotic clozapine has shown superior efficacy compared with other antipsychotics and is the gold standard for treating otherwise treatment resistant schizophrenia. However, multiple studies have found that clozapine is underutilised in most parts of the world. A few reviews of literature addressing barriers to clozapine prescribing have been conducted. While there is some variation in the literature included in these reviews, a common feature of the studies included is that they primarily focus on clinical staff's attitudes and perceived barriers for prescribing. Studies of patient perspectives are only sparsely included. A preliminary literature search revealed though, that additional literature on the subject exists, including literature on patient perspectives. It is therefore difficult to conclude if the formerly synthesised literature is representative of current evidence or if the topic has been adequately investigated to inform clinical practice. A scoping review is warranted in order to map and synthesise primary literature on patients' and psychiatrists' perspectives on clozapine treatment, and to identify gaps for future research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The electronic databases Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, Psychinfo, MEDLINE and EMBASE will be searched for relevant publications, supplied with searches of Google scholar, The Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations and OpenGrey. Citation tracking of selected studies will furthermore be undertaken. Two researchers will independently screen and extract data. Data will be collated to provide a descriptive summary of the literature, along with a qualitative content analysis of key findings. Identified gaps in research will be accompanied by recommendations for future investigations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations. The scoping review does not require ethics approval.

Indexed as

ClozapinePsychiatryDelivery of Health CareHumansPeer ReviewResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicClozapineadult psychiatrymental healthpsychiatryschizophrenia & psychotic disorders

Identifiers

PMID34620673
PMCPMC8499327
OpenAlexW3203931903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.