ArticleBMJ open2021
Impacts of clinical academic activity: qualitative interviews with healthcare managers and research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals and pharmacists.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Barriers and Enablers of Primary Healthcare Professionals in Health Research Engagement: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Facilitators and barriers to innovation and research capacity among clinical nurses: A qualitative systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Experiences and perceptions of occupational therapy and physiotherapy practice education in research settings.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
- Real-world impact: using digital platforms to capture clinical impact in healthcare professionals research.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2026Article
- Strategies to Position the Clinical Academic Nurse in University, Teaching and General Hospitals.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Early career research capacity-building for the health and social care workforce: process evaluation of internships and fellowships provided through a research-practice partnership.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Attitudes, interest and involvement of midwives in an RCT: A qualitative study with a phenomenological approach.European journal of midwifery · 2026Article
- The Impact of Research Results Feedback on the Lived Experiences of Elderly Participants in the DIMAMO Health Demographic Site: A Case of AWI-Gen Participants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- The benefits for health care staff of involvement in applied health research: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Article
- The impact of a clinical academic nurse researcher in critical care: A 1-year service review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Early career midwives' experiences of development opportunities and their relation to retention and job satisfaction: an interpretative phenomenological analysis study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Embedding clinical research in pre-registration nursing and midwifery programmes.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2024Article
- Exploring individual character traits and behaviours of clinical academic allied health professionals: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Development of a framework and research impact capture tool for nursing, midwifery, allied health professions, healthcare science, pharmacy and psychology (NMAHPPs).BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Reflections on contributing to health research: A qualitative interview study with research participants and patient advisors.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the perceived impacts of clinical academic activity among the professions outside medicine.
designQualitative semistructured interviews. SETTING AND
participantsThere were two groups of interviewees: Research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals, healthcare scientists, psychologists and pharmacists (NMAHPPs) and managers of these professions. All participants were employed in a single, multisite healthcare organisation in the UK. ANALYSIS: Interview transcripts were analysed using the framework method to identify key themes, subthemes and areas of divergence.
resultsFour themes were identified. The first, cultural shifts, described the perceived improvements in the approach to patient care and research culture that were associated with clinical academic activity. The second theme explored visibility and included the positive reputation that clinical academics were identified as bringing to the organisation in contrast with perceived levels of invisibility and inaccessibility of these roles. The third theme identified the impacts of the clinical academic pathways, including the precarity of these roles. The final theme explored making impact tangible, and described interviewees' suggestions of possible methods to record and demonstrate impact.
conclusionsPerceived positive impacts of NMAHPP clinical academic activity focused on interlinked positive changes for patients and clinical teams. This included delivery of evidence-based healthcare, patient involvement in clinical decision making and improved staff recruitment and retention. However, the positive impacts of clinical academic activity often centred around individual clinicians and did not necessarily translate throughout the organisation. The current clinical academic pathway was identified as causing tension between the perceived value of clinical academic activity and the need to find sufficient staffing to cover clinical services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.