Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34620654›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2021

Observational cohort study of the triggers, diagnoses and outcomes of the medical emergency team (MET) response in adult psychiatry inpatients colocated with acute medical services in Australia.

Meor Azraai, Jeanette H Pham, Wenye F Looi, Daniel Wirth, Ashley S L Ng, Umesh Babu, Bharat Saluja, Andy K H Lim

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence, treatment, and outcomes of sepsis during rapid response team calls: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meor AzraaiDepartment of General Medicine, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Jeanette H PhamDepartment of General Medicine, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Wenye F LooiDepartment of General Medicine, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel WirthDepartment of General Medicine, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Ashley S L NgDepartment of General Medicine, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3766-4578
Umesh BabuDepartment of Psychiatry, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Bharat SalujaDepartment of Psychiatry, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Andy K H LimDepartment of General Medicine, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia andy.lim@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7816-4724
Monash Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMedical emergencies in psychiatric inpatients are challenging due to the model of care and limited medical resources. The study aims were to determine the triggers and outcomes of a medical emergency team (MET) call in psychiatric wards, and the risk factors for MET activation and mortality.

designRetrospective multisite cohort study.

settingPsychiatry units colocated with acute medical services at three major metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne, Australia.

participantsWe studied 487 adult inpatients who experienced a total of 721 MET calls between January 2015 and January 2020. Patients were relatively young (mean age, 45 years) and had few medical comorbidities, but a high prevalence of smoking, excessive alcohol intake and illicit drug use. OUTCOME MEASURES: We performed a descriptive analysis of the triggers and outcomes (transfer rates, investigations, final diagnosis) of MET calls. We used logistic regression to determine the factors associated with the primary outcome of inpatient mortality, and the secondary outcome of the need for specific medical treatment compared with simple observation.

resultsThe most common MET triggers were a reduced Glasgow Coma Scale, tachycardia and hypotension, and 49% of patients required transfer. The most frequent diagnosis was a drug adverse effect or toxidrome, followed by infection and dehydration. There was a strong association between a leave of absence and MET calls, tachycardia and the final diagnosis of drug adverse effects. Mortality occurred in 3% after MET calls. Several baseline and MET clinical variables were associated with mortality but a model with age (per 10 years, OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.01) and hypoxia (OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.43 to 9.04) independently predicted mortality.

conclusionVigilance is required in patients returning from day leave, and drug adverse effects remain a challenging problem in psychiatric units. Hypoxic older patients with cardiovascular comorbidity have a higher risk of death.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesPsychiatryChildCohort StudiesEmergenciesHumansInpatientsMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesepidemiologyinternal medicinemental healthpsychiatryrisk management

Identifiers

PMID34620654
PMCPMC8499333
OpenAlexW3204358722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.