Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34620623›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Level of hM4D(Gi) DREADD Expression Determines Inhibitory and Neurotoxic Effects in the Hippocampus.

Marie-Gabrielle Goossens, Lars Emil Larsen, Marijke Vergaelen, Wytse Wadman, Chris Van den Haute, Wayra Brackx, Silke Proesmans, Jana Desloovere, Emma Christiaen, Erine Craey and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Investigations on the Ability of the Insular Cortex to Process Peripheral Immunosuppression.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Perturbing cortical networks:Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Applications of chemogenetics in non-human primates.Current opinion in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marie-Gabrielle Goossens4BRAIN, Department Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Lars Emil Larsen4BRAIN, Department Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Marijke Vergaelen4BRAIN, Department Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2915-667X
Wytse Wadman4BRAIN, Department Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Chris Van den HauteLaboratory for Neurobiology and Gene Therapy, Center for Molecular Medicine and Leuven Brain Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Wayra BrackxDepartment of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2872-1016
Silke Proesmans4BRAIN, Department Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Jana Desloovere4BRAIN, Department Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Emma ChristiaenMedisip, Department Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Erine Craey4BRAIN, Department Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Christian VanhoveMedisip, Department Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Kristl Vonck4BRAIN, Department Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Paul Boon4BRAIN, Department Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Robrecht Raedt4BRAIN, Department Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium robrecht.raedt@ugent.be.
University College Ghent · BEGhent University Hospital · BEVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective neuromodulation using designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) has become an increasingly important research tool, as well as an emerging therapeutic approach. However, the safety profile of DREADD expression is unknown. Here, different titers of adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector were administered in an attempt to vary total expression levels of the inhibitory DREADD hM4D(Gi) in excitatory hippocampal neurons. Male Sprague Dawley rats were injected with AAV2/7 encoding DREADD-mCherry, DREADD, or mCherry. Pronounced neuronal loss and neuroinflammatory reactions were observed after transduction with the high titer DREADD AAV, which also resulted in the highest DREADD expression levels. No such effects were observed in the mCherry control group, despite an equally high titer, nor in conditions where lower viral vector titers were injected. In the high titer DREADD conditions, dentate gyrus (DG) evoked potentials were inhibited on clozapine-induced activation of hM4D(Gi), while in low titer conditions DG evoked potentials were enhanced. Recordings of single neuronal activity nevertheless indicated a reduction in spontaneous firing of granule cell layer neurons. Our results indicate that prolonged, high levels of DREADD expression can have neurotoxic effects and that chemogenetic suppression of excitatory hippocampal neurons can paradoxically enhance DG evoked potentials.

Indexed as

ClozapineHippocampusAnimalsEvoked PotentialsMaleNeuronsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyClozapinechemogeneticsDREADDhippocampusneurotoxicityratviral vector

Identifiers

PMID34620623
PMCPMC8570686
OpenAlexW3202256742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.