ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2021
The First Examination of Diagnostic Performance of Automated Measurement of the Callosal Angle in 1856 Elderly Patients and Volunteers Indicates That 12.4% of Exams Met the Criteria for Possible Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screening for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus on Head CT Using Automated Callosal Angle Assessment.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Automated deep learning pipeline for callosal angle quantification.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025Article
- Automated Detection of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Using CT Imaging for Calculating the Ventricle-to-Subarachnoid Volume Ratio.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Automated Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Diagnosis via Artificial Intelligence-Based 3D T1 MRI Volumetric Analysis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- A protocol for a cohort study investigating clinical and radiological features of normal pressure hydrocephalus in South London memory services.Wellcome open research · 2025Article
- Prediction of Surgical Outcomes in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus by MR Elastography.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Structural neuroimaging markers of normal pressure hydrocephalus versus Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinson's disease, and hydrocephalus versus atrophy in chronic TBI-a narrative review.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- X-linked hydrocephalus genes: Their proximity to telomeres and high A + T content compared to Parkinson's disease.Experimental neurology · 2023Review
- Callosal Angle Narrowing in Research Data Bases of the Cognitively Impaired.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022Article
- TRPV4 mRNA is elevated in the caudate nucleus with NPH but not in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Pathophysiological Mechanisms Underlying Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Review of Recent Insights.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Review
- The compensatory mechanism and clinical significance of hydrocephalus after cranioplasty.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeMany patients with dementia may have comorbid or misdiagnosed normal pressure hydrocephalus, a treatable neurologic disorder. The callosal angle is a validated biomarker for normal pressure hydrocephalus with 93% diagnostic accuracy. Our purpose was to develop and evaluate an algorithm for automatically computing callosal angles from MR images of the brain. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis article reports the results of analyzing callosal angles from 1856 subjects with 5264 MR images from the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative databases. Measurement variability was examined between 2 neuroradiologists (
resultsThe algorithm identified that 12.4% of subjects from these carefully screened cohorts had callosal angles of <90°, a published threshold for possible normal pressure hydrocephalus. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.97 for agreement between neuroradiologists and 0.90 for agreement between manual and automatic measurement. The method was robust to different head orientations. The median coefficient of variation for repeat examinations was 4.2% (Q1 = 3.1%, Q3 = 5.8%). The simulated classification of normal pressure hydrocephalus versus Alzheimer using the automatic callosal angle had an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.87 each.
conclusionsIn even the most pristine research databases, analyses of the callosal angle indicate that some patients may have normal pressure hydrocephalus. The automatic callosal angle measurement can rapidly and objectively screen for normal pressure hydrocephalus in patients who would otherwise be misdiagnosed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.