Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34620344›Full record

Observational studyClinical nutrition ESPEN2021

Tailoring nutrition therapy amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Does it work?

Radha Reddy Chada, Sachin Chidrawar, Ayesha Siddiqua, Rajiv Medanki, Syeda Amena Omer, Balakrishna Nagalla

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical nutrition ESPEN, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Radha Reddy ChadaDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, and Dietetics, AIG Hospitals, Mindspace Road, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500032, India. Electronic address: radha402@gmail.com.
Sachin ChidrawarDepartment of Intensive Care, Sunshine Hospitals, Secunderabad, Telangana, India; Bathurst Hospital, NSW, Australia; The Mater Hospital, Townsville, Australia. Electronic address: sachin.jahnavi@gmail.com.
Ayesha SiddiquaDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Sunshine Hospitals, Secunderabad, Telangana, India. Electronic address: aayeshasiddiqua1996@gmail.com.
Rajiv MedankiDepartment of Nephrology, Sunshine Hospitals, Secunderabad, Telangana, India. Electronic address: rajivmedanki@gmail.com.
Syeda Amena OmerDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, and Dietetics, AIG Hospitals, Mindspace Road, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500032, India. Electronic address: amena9@gmail.com.
Balakrishna NagallaDivision of Biostatistics, National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. Electronic address: dr_nbk@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has been a challenge for nutrition monitoring and delivery. This study evaluates clinical and nutritional characteristics of patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and investigates the relationship between nutrition delivery and clinical outcomes.

methodsProspective observational study of adults admitted for >24 hrs to a tertiary-care hospital during a period of 2months. Data was collected on disease severity, energy, protein delivery and adequacy, use of mechanical ventilation (MV), hospital length of stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the associations with mortality as the primary outcome.

results1083 patients: 69% male (n = 747), 31% females (n = 336), mean age 58.2 ± 12.8 with 26.6 ± 4.32 BMI were analysed. 1021 patients survived and 62 deaths occurred, with 183 and 900 patients in the ICU and ward, respectively. Inadequate calorie and protein delivery had significantly higher mortality than those with adequate provision (p < 0.001) among the ICU patients. In bivariate logistic regression analysis, inadequacy of energy and protein, disease severity, comorbidities ≥3, NRS score ≥3 and prone ventilation correlates with mortality (p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis of the ICU patients, energy inadequacy (OR:3.6, 95%CI:1.25-10.2) and prone ventilation (OR:11.0, 95%CI:3.8-31.9) were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with mortality after adjusting for disease severity, comorbidities and MV days.

conclusionMost patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 are at nutrition risk that can impact outcome. Our data suggest that addressing nutritional adequacy can be one of the measures to reduce hospital LOS, and mortality among nutritionally risk patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdultAgedCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional SupportSARS-CoV-2AdequacyCOVID-19EnergyICULOSMortalityProtein

Identifiers

PMID34620344
PMCPMC8299140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.