ArticleJournal of medical case reports2021
Retinal artery occlusion as a probable idiosyncratic reaction to topical minoxidil: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technological Advances in Anti-hair Loss and Hair Regrowth Cosmeceuticals: Mechanistic Breakthroughs and Industrial Prospects Driven by Multidisciplinary Collaborative Innovation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Review
- From Hair Loss to Vision Loss: Minoxidil-Associated CRVO in a Young Female.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
- Short-Term Topical Minoxidil Use Associated with Acute Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Case Report.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinoxidil hair formulation is commonly used for the treatment of male or female androgenic alopecia. This over-the-counter product is considered safe, but should be used with caution. Ocular side effects following topical minoxidil use are rarely reported. In this paper, we report a rare case of inferior hemiretinal artery occlusion possibly caused by topical 5% minoxidil treatment. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 21-year-old Asian Indian male presented to the retina clinic with sudden onset blurring of vision and superior visual field loss in the right eye since morning. He was diagnosed with androgenic alopecia and was on treatment with topical 5% minoxidil spray twice a day for the last 3 years. On examination, his corrected distance visual acuity was 6/6, N6 in both eyes. Anterior segment examination and intraocular pressure in both eyes and left eye fundus were within normal limits. Right eye fundus examination showed features suggestive of inferior hemiretinal artery occlusion, which were confirmed on fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography. A detailed systemic evaluation and investigations (blood pressure, random blood sugar, hematological and coagulation profile, serum homocysteine level, Mantoux test, chest x-ray, cardiac two-dimensional echography, thyroid function test, and immunological profile) did not detect any abnormalities. The ocular condition and its visual prognosis were explained to the patient, and he was asked to review after 4 weeks.
conclusionThough there is no definite cause-outcome relationship between topical minoxidil use and retinal artery occlusion development, this possibility should be kept in mind when observing retinal vascular occlusion cases with concurrent use of topical minoxidil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.