Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34620166›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2021

A cross-sectional retrospective study of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in  domestic cats, dogs and rabbits in Poland.

Małgorzata Pomorska-Mól, Hanna Turlewicz-Podbielska, Maciej Gogulski, Jakub J Ruszkowski, Magdalena Kubiak, Anna Kuriga, Przemysław Barket, Marek Postrzech

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Małgorzata Pomorska-MólDepartment of Preclinical Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wołynska 35, 60-637, Poznan, Poland. mpomorska@up.poznan.pl.
Hanna Turlewicz-PodbielskaDepartment of Preclinical Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wołynska 35, 60-637, Poznan, Poland.
Maciej GogulskiDepartment of Preclinical Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wołynska 35, 60-637, Poznan, Poland.
Jakub J RuszkowskiDepartment of Animal Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animals Sciences, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71C, 60-625, Poznan, Poland.
Magdalena KubiakDepartment of Internal Medicine and Diagnostics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wolynska 35, 60-637, Poznan, Poland.
Anna KurigaDepartment of Preclinical Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wołynska 35, 60-637, Poznan, Poland.
Przemysław BarketVeterinary Clinic Centrum Małych Zwierząt S.C. M. i P. Barket, Przemysl, Poland.
Marek PostrzechVeterinary Clinic Esculap, Deblin, Poland.
University of Life Sciences in Poznań · PLSamodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej w Lubartowie · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronaviruses (CoVs) have long been known to cause infection in domestic and free-living birds and mammals including humans. The zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2 and the biological properties of CoVs, including ability to cross interspecies barriers, enable its emergence in populations of various animals, including companion animals (cats, dogs, rabbits) an area requiring further study. To date, several cases of cats and dogs positive for SARS-CoV-2 and/or specific antibodies have been described. The aim of our cross-sectional retrospective study is to determine seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in domestic dog, cat and rabbit population during recent COVID-19 pandemic in Poland.

resultsIn total, serum samples from 279 cats and 343 dogs and 29 rabbits were used in the study. The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in cats and dogs reached 1.79% (95% CI: 0.77 - 4.13) and 1.17% (95% CI 0.45 - 2.96), respectively (p ≥ 0.05). Anti- SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 5 cats (mean S/P% 106 ± 48.23) and 4 dogs (mean S/P% 78.5 ± 16.58). All 29 samples from rabbits were negative for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. No significant gender or age differences in seroprevalence in dogs and cats (p ≥ 0.05) were found. None of the animals with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies displayed respiratory or gastrointestinal signs at the time of sampling.

conclusionsOur results confirmed previous findings that SARS-CoV-2 infections in companion animals occurs but are not frequent. Future serological testing of large pet population may provide a comprehensive picture of disease dynamics in companion animals.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralCatsCross-Sectional StudiesDogsPolandRabbitsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesSerologic TestsAntibodies, ViralCross-sectional surveyPetsSeroprevalenceSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2Zoonotic coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID34620166
PMCPMC8495444
OpenAlexW3202569089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.