Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34620117›Full record

Trial reportBMC emergency medicine2021

Comparison of a metronome-guided prehospital medication infusion technique with standard calculation: a simulated randomized, controlled, cross-over study.

Samuel M Galvagno, James Cloepin, Jeannie Hannas, Kurt S Rubach, Andrew Naumann, Jonathan Wendell

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel M GalvagnoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S Greene Street, T5S18, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. sgalvagno@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5563-4092
James CloepinAnne Arundel County Fire Department, Millersville, MD, 21108, USA.
Jeannie HannasAnne Arundel County Fire Department, Millersville, MD, 21108, USA.
Kurt S RubachBaltimore-Washington Medical Center, Glen Burnie, Baltimore, MD, 21061, USA.
Andrew NaumannMaryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems (MIEMSS), 653 West Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Jonathan WendellAnne Arundel County Fire Department, Millersville, MD, 21108, USA.
Anne Arundel County Public Schools · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USMaryland Medical Research Institute · USUniversity of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited research regarding administration of timed medication infusions in the prehospital environment has identified wide variability with accuracy, timing, and overall feasibility. This study was a quality improvement project that utilized a randomized, controlled, crossover study design to compare two different educational techniques for medication infusion administration. We hypothesized that the use of a metronome-based technique would decrease medication dosage errors and reduce time to administration for intravenous medication infusions.

methodsForty-two nationally registered paramedics were randomized to either a metronome-based technique versus a standard stopwatch-based technique. Each subject served as a control. Subjects were asked to establish an infusion of amiodarone at a dose of 150 mg administered over 10 min, simulating treatment of a hemodynamically stable patient with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Descriptive statistics and a repeated measures mixed linear regression model were used for data analysis.

resultsWhen compared to a standard stopwatch-based technique, a metronome-based technique was associated with faster time to goal (median 34 s [IQR, 22-54] vs 50 s; [IQR 38-61 s], P = 0.006) and fewer mid-infusion adjustments. Ease of use was reported to be significantly higher for the metronome group (median ranking 5, IQR 4-5) compared to the standard group (median ranking 2, IQR 2-3; P < 0.001).

conclusionsKnowledge regarding a metronome technique may help EMS clinicians provide safe and effective IV infusions. Such a technique may be beneficial for learners and educators alike.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency Medical TechniciansMedication ErrorsAllied Health PersonnelCross-Over StudiesHumansInfusions, IntravenousEmergency medical servicesMedical calculationMedication dosingMedication infusionPrehospitalResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID34620117
PMCPMC8495908
OpenAlexW3166421336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.