Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34619999›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

A WhatsApp-Based Intervention to Improve Maternal Social Support and Maternal-Child Health in Southern Brazil: The Text-Message Intervention to Enhance Social Support (TIES) Feasibility Study.

Angela C B Trude, Rafaela Costa Martins, Thais Martins-Silva, Cauane Blumenberg, Marina X Carpena, Bianca Del-Ponte, Christian Loret de Mola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angela C B TrudeGrowth and Nutrition Division, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, 12264University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2881-1089
Rafaela Costa MartinsPost-graduation Program in Epidemiology, 37902Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazi.
Thais Martins-SilvaPost-graduation Program in Epidemiology, 37902Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazi.
Cauane BlumenbergPost-graduation Program in Epidemiology, 37902Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazi.ORCID 0000-0002-4580-3849
Marina X CarpenaInnovation in Health Research Group, 67820Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Brazil.
Bianca Del-PontePost-graduation Program in Epidemiology, 37902Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazi.
Christian Loret de MolaInnovation in Health Research Group, 67820Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participatory learning and action cycles with women's groups have been recommended by the WHO to promote maternal and newborn health, but few studies have tested its feasibility and acceptability in mobile health (mHealth) interventions among mothers of toddlers. This was a mixed-method feasibility assessment of an 8-week WhatsApp-based maternal support group for mothers of toddlers (12-18 months of age) enrolled in a birth cohort study in Southern Brazil. Daily messages and weekly activities were sent by moderators to promote maternal-child outcomes: child nutrition, child sleep, nurturing care, and maternal psychosocial well-being (assessed pre- and post-intervention via self-reported questionnaire). The implementation and engagement of the mothers in the program were assessed by message extraction. Acceptability was evaluated through in-depth interviews (n = 5) and open-ended surveys (n = 10). 1481 messages were exchanged in 3 WhatsApp groups (n = 30 mothers). Mothers were most active on weekdays (68.6% of messages sent on Tuesdays and 72.6% on Thursdays), afternoons (2:00-4:00pm), and evenings (9:00-11:00 pm). Engagement was higher at weeks 1-4. Mothers enjoyed and considered topics relevant. Group interaction was perceived as low, which influenced their participation. The prevalence of depression symptoms decreased from pre- to post-intervention (9% to 5%;

Indexed as

Child HealthMothersSocial SupportBrazilCohort StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMobile Applicationsfeasibilityfood neophobiainterventionmaternal–child healthmHealthnurturing carepsychosocial wellbeingWhatsApp

Identifiers

PMID34619999
PMCPMC8504647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.